202
edits
Changes
→Suggestion: I still dislike the opening paragraph
:: Well as I understand it, the major scholarly work on the topic is Heselton's ''Wiccan Roots''. Heselton and all other major scholars agree that the neo-pagans constructed their ideas largely out of whole cloth and are not the witches referred to in the Bible or other early sources. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 16:39, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
:: Well as I understand it, the major scholarly work on the topic is Heselton's ''Wiccan Roots''. Heselton and all other major scholars agree that the neo-pagans constructed their ideas largely out of whole cloth and are not the witches referred to in the Bible or other early sources. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 16:39, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
I've no real involvement in this article but the first 4 sentences still read like a weird rant. True or not, depending on your religious views (and mine don't condone witchcraft), these are still written in a style unbecoming of an encyclopedia (one written by adults anyway). Please can someone rewrite them with the proper links to the Bible and less of the ranting. [[User:Fingermouse|Fingermouse]] 20:11, 25 May 2007 (EDT)