Changes

731 bytes added ,  08:28, July 9, 2021
Line 394: Line 394:     
::::I'm gradually changing the article so that instead of denying global warming, it is stating that it exists, and the solutions that the right prefers to prevent it, as opposed to the left. I also noted how much China contributes to global warming. [[User:ChenXiansheng|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng|talk]]) 10:05, July 8, 2021 (EDT)
 
::::I'm gradually changing the article so that instead of denying global warming, it is stating that it exists, and the solutions that the right prefers to prevent it, as opposed to the left. I also noted how much China contributes to global warming. [[User:ChenXiansheng|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng|talk]]) 10:05, July 8, 2021 (EDT)
 +
:::::I think the lead makes it clear why this theory is a lot nonsense. The IPCC predicts a specific amount of warming per decade -- and nothing like that is happening. The 1930s were warm too. You can make the apparent warming disappear if you start the clock in the late 1930s. There was a temperature peak in 2016. But media gets more hysterical every year. When Lindzen was asked make predictions, he'd say there's a third chance it will get warmer, a one third change it will stay the same, and a one third chance it will get cooler. There has been no advance on this front in the last thirty years. Lindzen prediction is still the best we have. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 04:28, July 9, 2021 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
14,282

edits