Changes

no edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:  
had to go on the equivalent of a “where’s Waldo” hunt.  These irregularities existed wherever Zuckerberg’s money was granted to local election officials.<ref>https://trumpwon.biz/The-Legitimacy-and-Effect-of-Private-Funding-in-Federal-and-State-Electorial-Processes-1.pdf</ref>
 
had to go on the equivalent of a “where’s Waldo” hunt.  These irregularities existed wherever Zuckerberg’s money was granted to local election officials.<ref>https://trumpwon.biz/The-Legitimacy-and-Effect-of-Private-Funding-in-Federal-and-State-Electorial-Processes-1.pdf</ref>
    +
==2020 general election==
 
=====Ballot dump=====
 
=====Ballot dump=====
 
[[File:Milwaukee turnout 2020.jpeg|right|300px|thumb|Turnout exceeded registered voters in some Milwaukee precincts by 200%.]]
 
[[File:Milwaukee turnout 2020.jpeg|right|300px|thumb|Turnout exceeded registered voters in some Milwaukee precincts by 200%.]]
Line 49: Line 50:  
=====Fraudulent ballots=====
 
=====Fraudulent ballots=====
 
Under Wisconsin state law, a voter must present a valid photo ID when requesting to vote by mail. The exception to the rule is for those voters who are currently hospitalized or “indefinitely confined because of age, physical illness, or infirmity.”<ref>https://redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/11/24/trump-campaign-focusing-on-unlawful-use-of-absentee-ballot-process-to-avoid-wisconsin-id-requirement-n284528</ref>  [[Covid]] doesn't meet the qualifications for an "indefinitely confined" voter.
 
Under Wisconsin state law, a voter must present a valid photo ID when requesting to vote by mail. The exception to the rule is for those voters who are currently hospitalized or “indefinitely confined because of age, physical illness, or infirmity.”<ref>https://redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/11/24/trump-campaign-focusing-on-unlawful-use-of-absentee-ballot-process-to-avoid-wisconsin-id-requirement-n284528</ref>  [[Covid]] doesn't meet the qualifications for an "indefinitely confined" voter.
 +
 +
==2020 primnary election==
 +
=====Primary election tampering=====
 +
In a lawsuit filed by Democratic party operatives concerned about the [[CCP pandemic]]’s effects on voting, federal District Judge William Conley (an [[Obama]] appointee) extended the deadline for receipt of mail-in ballots from Tuesday, April 7, 2020 (the primary-election day), to Monday afternoon, April 13. That aspect of the federal district court’s ruling was not in dispute. Judge Conley, however, directed that [[absentee ballot]]s were eligible to be counted regardless of the date of post mark or otherwise delivered, as long as they came in by the April 13 deadline. In effect, that meant absentee ballots could be cast after in-person primary voting had closed on April 7.
 +
 +
This meant the election could be materially altered by events occurring after formal conclusion of the [[primary election]] — not least, news about the apparent election result. To address this problem, Judge Conley further ordered the Wisconsin Election Commission and election inspectors to suppress any report of the voting results until after the new April 13 deadline for the receipt of absentee ballots.<ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/04/the-supreme-courts-misunderstood-ruling-on-wisconsins-coronavirus-primary/</ref>  Democrat Gov. [[Tony Evers]] then banned in person voting in the April 7, 2020 primary.  The Wisconsin Supreme Court then ruled Evers exceeded his authority with his [[Executive Order]] to cancel elections.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEIrRZpwsqQ</ref>  The same day [[SCOTUS]] ruled to stay a district court order that had extended the absentee voting deadline. As a result, the absentee ballot postmark and in-person return deadlines were reinstated to April 7, 2020.<ref>https://ballotpedia.org/Democratic_Party_primaries_in_Wisconsin,_2020</ref>  The issue  was that authority did not rest with the courts or the governor and there was no time to reschedule.  [[Fake news]] media, of course, was quick to blame Republicans for the Democrat's lawsuit and the Democratic governor's overreach of [[executive branch]] authority.<ref>https://www.facebook.com/dan.bongino/videos/775321722874199/</ref>  Democrat operative [[James Carville]] again stole the spotlight as the most [[demagogic]].<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/04/08/carville-wisconsin-primary-proved-republicans-will-kill-people-to-stay-in-power/</ref>  ''The Wisconsin State Journal'' reported three weeks after the voting that Wisconsin's rate of infection actually declined after in-person voting.<ref>https://madison.com/wsj/news/local/health-med-fit/no-bump-in-covid-19-rates-after-wisconsins-april-7-election-study-says/article_b1aade1d-abec-5fc2-92fb-e1c64ccbc92f.html</ref>
 +
 +
=====Supreme Court agrees to hear the case=====
 +
''Redstate'' reported:
 +
{{quotebox|"a federal judge extended the deadline for receiving [[absentee ballot]]s during the [[primary election]] cycle by a period of six days.  No one objected to that extension in the early days of state “lockdown” orders to address the outbreak of the COVID 19 virus.  But, five days before the scheduled election, the same judge clarified the order to state that ballots postmarked on or before the extended day for receipt of ballots could be counted even though that violated Wisconsin election law which required that they be postmarked no later than Election Day, and no party in the case had asked for the Court to grant the additional relief.  The Supreme Court reversed that provision of the district court’s order, writing as follows:
 +
 +
:''Nonetheless, five days before the scheduled election, the District Court unilaterally ordered that absentee ballots mailed and postmarked after election day, April 7, still be counted so long as they are received by April 13. Extending the date by which ballots may be cast by voters—not just received by the municipal clerks but cast by voters— for an additional six days after the scheduled election day fundamentally alters the nature of the election…  This Court has repeatedly emphasized that lower federal courts should ordinarily not alter the election rules on the eve of an election….  The District Court on its own ordered yet an additional extension, which would allow voters to mail their ballots after election day, which is extraordinary relief and would fundamentally alter the nature of the election by allowing voting for six additional days after the election.
 +
 +
The four liberals on the Court, including the late [[Justice Ginsburg]], dissented from this order and would have allowed votes to be cast and counted after the deadline imposed by state law in Wisconsin, basing their judgment on the complications of the COVID 19 pandemic.
 +
 +
So, you can see where the lower court judges are finding their “justification” for rewriting election rules more to the liking of plaintiffs who — in every case I’ve looked at — are Democrat party interest groups."<ref>https://www.redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/10/04/a-supreme-court-showdown-of-federal-judges-rewriting-state-election-laws-based-on-covid-is-at-hand/</ref>}}
 +
 +
After Wisconsin's primary vote, [[Bernie Sanders]] dropped out of the race, pledging to toe the CCP/DNC party line; however an ''ABC/Washington Post'' poll showed 15% of Sanders supporters will support President Trump in the November 2020 general election.<ref>https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/03/29/bernie-sanders-supporters-vote-trump-over-biden-poll/2936124001/</ref>  Sanders press secretary immediately ripped off the mask, saying in a tweet that she can now drop "Democratic" from explaining why "Democratic Socialism" is good.<ref>https://summit.news/2020/04/08/bernies-press-secretary-now-i-can-drop-democratic-from-democratic-socialism/</ref>  With Sanders out and the nomination locked up, Barack Hussein Obama still failed to endorse Biden.
 +
 +
[[Priorities USA]] Action — the Democratic Party's largest super PAC — spent $6 million on advertisements criticizing President Trump for his response to the [[coronavirus]] pandemic. The ads ran in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Florida.  The PAC received $3 million in contributions from [[George Soros]]'s Democracy PAC on Feb. 21,  2020, or 77% of [[Priorities USA]] income for the reporting period.  Priorities USA said it intends to spend upward of $150 million against Trump in states like Wisconsin and Michigan. Its largest donor has been billionaire hedge fund manager Donald Sussman, who has given the group $8 million this cycle. Soros is the group's second-largest donor at $5 million.  In addition, [[David Brock]]'s American Bridge PAC has assailed Trump's coronavirus response. American Bridge has also been active in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan.<ref>https://freebeacon.com/2020-election/soros-bankrolls-coronavirus-attack-ads-against-trump/</ref>  Priorities USA aired a digitally altered ad that led to the [[NBC]] affiliate airing the ad being sued for defamation when it continued to air the ad after receiving a cease-and-desist order.
    
==References==
 
==References==
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,804

edits