Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,430
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: − +
→Stzok insurance policy
===Stzok insurance policy===
===Stzok insurance policy===
Benjamin Wittes was the first published reference to an "insurance policy" to subvert the Trump presidency, should he win. Wittes published it after Strzok first used the term to explain the reason for [[FISA abuse]] to [[Lisa Page]].<ref>[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/03/08/doj-political-surveillance-from-the-irs-in-2011-to-the-fisa-court-in-2016/ DOJ Political Surveillance – From the IRS in 2011 to the FISA Court in 2016], Posted on March 8, 2020 by sundance. theconservativetreehouse.com </ref> Wittes wrote,
Benjamin Wittes was the first published reference to an "insurance policy" to subvert the Trump presidency, should he win. Wittes published it after Strzok first used the term to explain the reason for [[FISA abuse]] to [[Lisa Page]].<ref>[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/03/08/doj-political-surveillance-from-the-irs-in-2011-to-the-fisa-court-in-2016/ DOJ Political Surveillance – From the IRS in 2011 to the FISA Court in 2016], Posted on March 8, 2020 by sundance. theconservativetreehouse.com </ref> Wittes wrote,
[[File:Peter-strzok-and-lisa-page.jpeg|right|500px|thumb|Peter Strzok (left) and Lisa Page (right).]]
[[File:Peter-strzok-and-lisa-page.jpeg|right|500px|thumb|Peter Strzok (left) and Lisa Page (right), ''The FBI Lovebirds.''<ref>https://youtu.be/tCutKd11kjg</ref>]]
{{quotebox-float|...our democracy needs a health insurance policy. Indeed, it’s not enough to imagine how the Coalition of All Democratic Forces, which I posited last Monday, might respond to a Clinton victory, a subject which I discussed on Tuesday.
{{quotebox-float|...our democracy needs a health insurance policy. Indeed, it’s not enough to imagine how the Coalition of All Democratic Forces, which I posited last Monday, might respond to a Clinton victory, a subject which I discussed on Tuesday.