| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| | #Conservapedia was the first to observe that the number of new conservative terms [[Essay:Best New Conservative Words|doubles by century]]. This ensures that the future is always increasingly [[conservative]], despite [[liberal bias]]. ''See also'' [[Essay:Conservapedia's Law|Conservapedia Law]], which states that the number of conservative insights increases over time at a geometric rate. | | #Conservapedia was the first to observe that the number of new conservative terms [[Essay:Best New Conservative Words|doubles by century]]. This ensures that the future is always increasingly [[conservative]], despite [[liberal bias]]. ''See also'' [[Essay:Conservapedia's Law|Conservapedia Law]], which states that the number of conservative insights increases over time at a geometric rate. |
| | #Conservapedia has long observed the implausibility of, and inconsistency in, [[Barack Obama]]'s claims to have converted to Christianity. On September 7, 2008, Obama referred to his "Muslim faith" in a nationally televised interview.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zQK_EhDhZQ][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQqIpdBOg6I] | | #Conservapedia has long observed the implausibility of, and inconsistency in, [[Barack Obama]]'s claims to have converted to Christianity. On September 7, 2008, Obama referred to his "Muslim faith" in a nationally televised interview.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zQK_EhDhZQ][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQqIpdBOg6I] |
| | + | #Conservapedia observed that the surprising counteroffensive by the [[Nazi]]s in the [[Battle of the Bulge]] during [[World War II]] probably resulted from [[Germany]] realizing that the [[Allies]] had cracked the code of its [[Enigma]]. |
| | #Conservapedia developed and sent a [[Letter to PNAS]] that identified five (5) specific flaws to a paper it published by [[Richard Lenski]] and others. The Lenski paper had been in [[peer review]] for no more than a mere 14 days prior to its publication by PNAS. More than a month after the flaws was publicly posted on Conservapedia, there was still no adequate explanation of the flaws, or corrections made. The [[Letter to PNAS]] was officially accepted by PNAS's electronic submission system in a form substantially similar to its presentation here. | | #Conservapedia developed and sent a [[Letter to PNAS]] that identified five (5) specific flaws to a paper it published by [[Richard Lenski]] and others. The Lenski paper had been in [[peer review]] for no more than a mere 14 days prior to its publication by PNAS. More than a month after the flaws was publicly posted on Conservapedia, there was still no adequate explanation of the flaws, or corrections made. The [[Letter to PNAS]] was officially accepted by PNAS's electronic submission system in a form substantially similar to its presentation here. |
| | #Conservapedia has long observed that girls are injured in sports at much higher rates than boys, and how [[liberals]] denial or downplay it.<ref>''See, e.g.'', point #6 in [[liberal denial]], under "more generally."</ref> Finally, on May 11, 2008, the [[New York Times]] recognized this fact by finally admitting that a girl's soccer team "with 18 players, had suffered eight A.C.L. tears — eight — during her high-school years. ... The rate of concussions sustained by high school girls who play soccer is 1.5 times the rate for boys who play soccer."<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/11/magazine/11Girls-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin</ref> | | #Conservapedia has long observed that girls are injured in sports at much higher rates than boys, and how [[liberals]] denial or downplay it.<ref>''See, e.g.'', point #6 in [[liberal denial]], under "more generally."</ref> Finally, on May 11, 2008, the [[New York Times]] recognized this fact by finally admitting that a girl's soccer team "with 18 players, had suffered eight A.C.L. tears — eight — during her high-school years. ... The rate of concussions sustained by high school girls who play soccer is 1.5 times the rate for boys who play soccer."<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/11/magazine/11Girls-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin</ref> |