Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
22 bytes added ,  18:28, September 6, 2021
add category
Line 11: Line 11:  
In a 5-4 decision (Justices Alito, Barrett, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Thomas in the majority) the Court refused to grant an injunction.  Chief Justice Roberts, in his dissent, argued that due to the unique private citizen provision, the matter should be stayed until hearings could be held, while Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor argued that the bill was an attack on the "constitutional right" to abortion.  As such, the law is currently in effect.
 
In a 5-4 decision (Justices Alito, Barrett, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Thomas in the majority) the Court refused to grant an injunction.  Chief Justice Roberts, in his dissent, argued that due to the unique private citizen provision, the matter should be stayed until hearings could be held, while Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor argued that the bill was an attack on the "constitutional right" to abortion.  As such, the law is currently in effect.
    +
[[Category:Abortion]]
 
[[Category:Texas]]
 
[[Category:Texas]]
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789

edits

Navigation menu