Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,727
edits
Changes
→Isikoff
::Interesting theory, although Wikileaks, Greenwald, and Snowden seem to disagree with it.
::Interesting theory, although Wikileaks, Greenwald, and Snowden seem to disagree with it.
::Meanwhile, the fact that Pompeo labeled Wikileaks as a hostile intelligence agency ''at all'' is both suspicious and reeking of malfeasance.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:17, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
::Meanwhile, the fact that Pompeo labeled Wikileaks as a hostile intelligence agency ''at all'' is both suspicious and reeking of malfeasance.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:17, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
:::The point is, there is a whole lot more to this story than reported. What has been reported is just another internal hit on Pompeo in the same way low-level operatives like [[Peter Stzok]] or [[Eric Ciaramella]] attempted to take out President Trump with media leaks. The issue is the same as the leak that reported Hillary Clinton saying, "Can't we just drone him?" While some advocate a pardon or immunity, the "interagency consensus" (to borrow a phrase used by both [[Vindman]] and now [[Milley}] is), Assange must be made an example of. If they don't whack him, he'll remain a hunted man his entire life bin Laden or Eichmann. The problem with arrest and trial is, he's committed no punishable crime.
:::From Greenwald & Snowden's perspective, I doubt I am saying anything that they would disagree with. And Wikileaks obviously has a conflict of interest in their response. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 14:52, September 30, 2021 (EDT)