Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,155
edits
Changes
Talk:Essay:The Problems with Conservapedia (view source)
Revision as of 19:40, October 17, 2021
, 19:40, October 17, 2021no edit summary
:::::::But... that's ''not'' the truth... If Conservapedia wants to act like a serious, "trusworthy" wiki that documents the American right, it needs to stop using labels for people that it doesn't like. [[User:ChenXiansheng|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng|talk]]) 15:10, October 17, 2021 (EDT)
:::::::But... that's ''not'' the truth... If Conservapedia wants to act like a serious, "trusworthy" wiki that documents the American right, it needs to stop using labels for people that it doesn't like. [[User:ChenXiansheng|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng|talk]]) 15:10, October 17, 2021 (EDT)
::::::::I agree. "totalitarian fascist" and "racist" are suffient to describe leftists. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup>
::::::::I agree. "totalitarian fascist" and "racist" are suffient to describe leftists. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup>
::::::::Heck, we could even throw in "anti-science" or "flatearthers" without sounding too hateful. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 15:40, October 17, 2021 (EDT)