Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,144
edits
Changes
Talk:Essay:The Problems with Conservapedia (view source)
Revision as of 00:47, October 18, 2021
, 00:47, October 18, 2021no edit summary
::Much of Dutton's work has a sound basis. It's how it's being used here that people find objections. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 20:26, October 17, 2021 (EDT)
::Much of Dutton's work has a sound basis. It's how it's being used here that people find objections. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 20:26, October 17, 2021 (EDT)
::So, how should scientific evidence of a greater likelihood of genetic mutations among atheists be used? Should it be used to mock people with disabilities? od created people with mutations, should they and/or God be mocked as well? No. This sort of evidence, or scientific evidence if you will, should be used like other warnings, like the signs of diabetes, sickle cell anemia, or warning signs of heart attack. I'm sure no one would object to informative content like that placed on MPR. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 20:46, October 17, 2021 (EDT)
::So, how should scientific evidence of a greater likelihood of genetic mutations among atheists be used? Should it be used to mock people with disabilities? God created people with mutations, should they and/or God be mocked as well? No. This sort of evidence, or scientific evidence if you will, should be used like other warnings, like the signs of diabetes, sickle cell anemia, or warning signs of heart attack. I'm sure no one would object to informative content like that placed on MPR. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 20:46, October 17, 2021 (EDT)