Block, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect, rollback
57,799
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + + + + +
no edit summary
In a 5-4 decision (Justices Alito, Barrett, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Thomas in the majority) the Court refused to grant an injunction. Chief Justice Roberts, in his dissent, argued that due to the unique private citizen provision, the matter should be stayed until hearings could be held, while Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor argued that the bill was an attack on the "constitutional right" to abortion. As such, the law is currently in effect.
In a 5-4 decision (Justices Alito, Barrett, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Thomas in the majority) the Court refused to grant an injunction. Chief Justice Roberts, in his dissent, argued that due to the unique private citizen provision, the matter should be stayed until hearings could be held, while Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor argued that the bill was an attack on the "constitutional right" to abortion. As such, the law is currently in effect.
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Texas Heartback Act}}
[[Category:Abortion]]
[[Category:Abortion]]
[[Category:Texas]]
[[Category:Texas]]
[[Category:Pro-Life]]
[[Category:Pro-Life]]