Changes

no edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:  
'''Attention [[atheist nerds]]:'''  
 
'''Attention [[atheist nerds]]:'''  
   −
'''1.''' [[Conservapedia]] is a 1,000+ atheism article death star on the internet that continues to vaporize the various planets of [[internet atheism]]. For example, please see: [[Essay: July 2, 2011: The day the atheism movement died on the information superhighway|July 2, 2011: The day the atheism movement died on the information superhighway]] and [[Essay: The Conservapedia atheism article is currently receiving about 11,110 page views a month. And it is one of the 1,000+ atheism articles at Conservapedia.#Conservapedia vs. the British New Atheist Richard Dawkins|Conservapedia vs. Richard Dawkins and his website]]
+
'''1.''' [[Conservapedia]] is a 1,000+ atheism article death star on the internet that continues to vaporize the various planets of [[internet atheism]]. For example, please see: [[Essay: July 2, 2011: The day the atheism movement died on the information superhighway|July 2, 2011: The day the atheism movement died on the information superhighway]] and [[Essay: The Conservapedia atheism article is currently receiving about 11,110 page views a month. And it is one of the 1,000+ atheism articles at Conservapedia.#Conservapedia vs. the British New Atheist Richard Dawkins|Conservapedia vs. the New Atheist Richard Dawkins]]
    
But unlike [[Star Wars]]' death star, Conservapedia's atheism/[[evolution]] articles have no vulnerabilities. I challenge you to find a single error in Conservapedia's atheism and evolution articles.  
 
But unlike [[Star Wars]]' death star, Conservapedia's atheism/[[evolution]] articles have no vulnerabilities. I challenge you to find a single error in Conservapedia's atheism and evolution articles.  
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,743

edits