245
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 58:
Line 58: + + +
→This article should redirect to [[Abstinence]]: no it shouldn't
::Just stick the 'deleted and protected due to vandalism' on the page. We are never going to agree about what would be appropriate. This is conservapedia remember, so there are a number of users here who think a description of the stork making a delivery would be too graphic. - Suricou
::Just stick the 'deleted and protected due to vandalism' on the page. We are never going to agree about what would be appropriate. This is conservapedia remember, so there are a number of users here who think a description of the stork making a delivery would be too graphic. - Suricou
::: :-)
::: Redirecting [[sex]] to [[abstinence]] makes exactly as much sense as redirecting [[alcohol]] to abstinence. In context, [[abstinence]] is abstaining from ''something''. It is not possible to describe or advocate abstinence without defining the thing to be abstained from. In both of these cases, it is something discussed in the Bible, and which is good when used properly (how God intended), and bad when abused. --[[User:Scott|Scott]] 10:31, 31 May 2007 (EDT)