| | ::::::::I'm saying your categorization schemes are essentially maintenance tasks. I suggested that in performing these maintenance tasks, they should not be done in a incomplete, half-baked, partisan manner leaving it to someone else to finish. They should be updated and complete, and not appear to be the work of a subversive partisan attempting to divide the Republican party. You're quick on the draw to update the article when some member of the GOP makes a statement about foreign intervention, or reverses him/her/their selves, and this obsession doesn't carry over to Democrats. Fine. I'm just asking that when you begin a task, to have the courtesy to other editors, and to our readers, to finish it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]</sup> 19:18, March 15, 2022 (EDT) | | ::::::::I'm saying your categorization schemes are essentially maintenance tasks. I suggested that in performing these maintenance tasks, they should not be done in a incomplete, half-baked, partisan manner leaving it to someone else to finish. They should be updated and complete, and not appear to be the work of a subversive partisan attempting to divide the Republican party. You're quick on the draw to update the article when some member of the GOP makes a statement about foreign intervention, or reverses him/her/their selves, and this obsession doesn't carry over to Democrats. Fine. I'm just asking that when you begin a task, to have the courtesy to other editors, and to our readers, to finish it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]</sup> 19:18, March 15, 2022 (EDT) |
| | :::::::::Let's take Rubio, for example. And let's further suppose that you are a DNC operative trying to infiltrate and subvert the conservative movement by attacking Rubio. So, now when the reader sees that Rubio is a neocon, and that he likely was voted out in the 114th Congress, doesn't that subvert your whole purpose? If the guy indeed is a dangerous neocon who needs to be removed, stressing that he's a sitting member of Congress would fulfil the task. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]</sup> 19:29, March 15, 2022 (EDT) | | :::::::::Let's take Rubio, for example. And let's further suppose that you are a DNC operative trying to infiltrate and subvert the conservative movement by attacking Rubio. So, now when the reader sees that Rubio is a neocon, and that he likely was voted out in the 114th Congress, doesn't that subvert your whole purpose? If the guy indeed is a dangerous neocon who needs to be removed, stressing that he's a sitting member of Congress would fulfil the task. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]</sup> 19:29, March 15, 2022 (EDT) |
| | + | ::::::::::Ah, okay; thank you, that makes a lot more sense. I see what you mean. I don't know much about which Congresses are which, so I'll have to do more research on that area when editing. Thanks for the tip. And for the record, I am ''not'' a DNC operative trying to infiltrate and subvert the conservative movement. If I was, I probably wouldn't have started here on CP. I'd probably be working for the [https://www.thedailybeast.com/newsmax-host-john-bachman-wonders-if-patriot-fronts-dc-march-was-orchestrated-by-feds Patriot Front] or the [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/27/proud-boys-leader-enrique-tarrio-fbi-informant Proud Boys] or something like that; they seem to have infiltrated those pretty effectively. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] <sup>[[talk|Christ Is King!]]</sup> 21:15, March 15, 2022 (EDT) |