Changes

→‎Section Two: Section 2 precedents
Line 27: Line 27:     
To prevail under another type of Section Two claim, "Both the possession of monopoly power and its willful misuse are necessary to sustain a charge of illegal monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Act."  ''United States v. S. Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc.'', 672 F.2d 469, 484 (5th Cir. 1982).
 
To prevail under another type of Section Two claim, "Both the possession of monopoly power and its willful misuse are necessary to sustain a charge of illegal monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Act."  ''United States v. S. Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc.'', 672 F.2d 469, 484 (5th Cir. 1982).
 +
 +
=== Section 2 precedents ===
 +
 +
*United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563, 570-71, 86 S. Ct. 1698, 1704, 16 L. Ed. 2d 778 (1966).
 +
*Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 271-76 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093, 100 S. Ct. 1061, 62 L. Ed. 2d 783 (1980).
 +
*United States v. Griffith, 334 U.S. 100, 107-08, 68 S. Ct. 941, 945-46, 92 L. Ed. 1236 (1948).
 +
*Smith-Kline Corp. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 575 F.2d 1056 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 838, 99 S. Ct. 123, 58 L. Ed. 2d 134 (1978); Pacific *Coast Agricultural Export Association v. Sunkist Growers, Inc., 526 F.2d 1196 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 959, 96 S. Ct. 1741, 48 L. Ed. 2d 204 (1976).
    
==See also==
 
==See also==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,445

edits