Changes

You may have doubted it when I told you, but we gotta learn the hard way. Here we have evidence that a childhood film of yours promoted an evil agenda. Prove me wrong. [https://youtu.be/euXi03tGoDE| Here is how Howard Ashman put his life into The Little Mermaid’s songs]. Ashman may have not said it publicly, but it was there. In defense of him, I couldn’t find anything that connects with it except “Part of Your World.” That being said, it was the most important song in the film’s story. In Ashman’s words, [https://youtu.be/y04xePQaDgA| “The leading lady usually sits down on something, and sings about what she wants in life. And the audience falls in love with her, and then roots for her to get it for the rest of the night.”] and it aligns with Ashman being an outcast for being a homosexual, much like Ariel who’s an outcast for wanting to be apart of the human world. Heck, in the Howard Ashman documentary, it ends with Ashman singing the song. Now of course, Ashman’s words I linked which were said before the film came out may contradict my claim, and you said that you use sources that were made around the time of the film such as feminist stuff in Beauty and the Beast and Vietcong propaganda in Star Wars. Speaking of Star Wars, you also said it can’t be from years later as George Lucas said he always intended the Special Edition changes such as Greedo shooting first. As for my claim, of course, I can’t find much information on what the crew was saying about it other than it pushed Glen Keane (A straight Christian) to animate not only animate Ariel, but him being the one that ultimately convinced Jeffrey Katzenberg to keep the song in the movie where John Musker, Ron Clements, Alan Menken, and Ashman (who threatened to quit) failed. Overall, I’ll admit, I kind of like it. [https://www.bitchute.com/video/EXfOh2xYPIez/| I had to sit through it while making that analysis video I showed you, and it’s stuck in my head.] And due to who wrote the song, and co-produced the film, I call it a guilty pleasure. [[User:Admiral_Farmer|Admiral_Farmer]] ([[User talk:Admiral_Farmer|talk]]) 16:48, July 3, 2022 (EDT)

You may have doubted it when I told you, but we gotta learn the hard way. Here we have evidence that a childhood film of yours promoted an evil agenda. Prove me wrong. [https://youtu.be/euXi03tGoDE| Here is how Howard Ashman put his life into The Little Mermaid’s songs]. Ashman may have not said it publicly, but it was there. In defense of him, I couldn’t find anything that connects with it except “Part of Your World.” That being said, it was the most important song in the film’s story. In Ashman’s words, [https://youtu.be/y04xePQaDgA| “The leading lady usually sits down on something, and sings about what she wants in life. And the audience falls in love with her, and then roots for her to get it for the rest of the night.”] and it aligns with Ashman being an outcast for being a homosexual, much like Ariel who’s an outcast for wanting to be apart of the human world. Heck, in the Howard Ashman documentary, it ends with Ashman singing the song. Now of course, Ashman’s words I linked which were said before the film came out may contradict my claim, and you said that you use sources that were made around the time of the film such as feminist stuff in Beauty and the Beast and Vietcong propaganda in Star Wars. Speaking of Star Wars, you also said it can’t be from years later as George Lucas said he always intended the Special Edition changes such as Greedo shooting first. As for my claim, of course, I can’t find much information on what the crew was saying about it other than it pushed Glen Keane (A straight Christian) to animate not only animate Ariel, but him being the one that ultimately convinced Jeffrey Katzenberg to keep the song in the movie where John Musker, Ron Clements, Alan Menken, and Ashman (who threatened to quit) failed. Overall, I’ll admit, I kind of like it. [https://www.bitchute.com/video/EXfOh2xYPIez/| I had to sit through it while making that analysis video I showed you, and it’s stuck in my head.] And due to who wrote the song, and co-produced the film, I call it a guilty pleasure. [[User:Admiral_Farmer|Admiral_Farmer]] ([[User talk:Admiral_Farmer|talk]]) 16:48, July 3, 2022 (EDT)

:Eh, I'm not entirely sure that's a promotion of the homosexual agenda, to be honest. All that indicates is that it was a way to have Ariel be sympathetic due to being an outcast (and besides, she still fell in love with Eric, who is a MAN, not a WOMAN, last I checked, so it simply CANNOT be considered a promotion of the homosexual agenda from that reason alone). Now, if he had specifically had Ariel sing in Part of Your World wanting to mate with a girl, THEN I can see where it would be going regarding a promotion of the homosexual agenda. But as it is? Let me put it this way, I related to Ariel's desire due to my being autistic and ALSO going through a really rough development growing up because of it, and I'm straight, and very much conservative and Christian (even if my own personal views of God are by my own admission downright warped thanks to Raiders of the Lost Ark, with stuff like Dragon Ball Z, the Matrix, Metal Gear Solid 2, and heck, even Jonathan Edwards' sermon not helping with my views of God at all.). Heck, put another way, since I constantly have to keep my conservative views silent while at college and nearly let my professors brainwash me even WITH my critical thinking that my parents instilled into me, and having to put up with my bosses openly talking about their leftist agendas at my old job at GoodWill within earshot while I myself can't even so much as mention my conservative views in front of them, that if anything makes Ariel even MORE relatable to me than before. There's a difference between merely relating to a character for being an outcast while using as an offhand example being homosexual for what qualifies as an outcast (which can be interchangeable for stuff like Autistic as well, or even Christian and Conservative), and using a very specific framework that literally cannot be viewed in any other way (the latter being the problem with The Mob Song in Beauty and the Beast due to Don Hahn stating that Howard Ashman SPECIFICALLY used the whole anti-AIDS thing as the basis behind the villager's fear). Besides, they modeled Ursula after Divine, a notorious drag queen, and made her the bad guy. I'm pretty sure if they wanted to promote such an evil agenda, they would NOT do it with the actual villain (aka, the kind of person you're specifically meant to root AGAINST).

:Eh, I'm not entirely sure that's a promotion of the homosexual agenda, to be honest. All that indicates is that it was a way to have Ariel be sympathetic due to being an outcast (and besides, she still fell in love with Eric, who is a MAN, not a WOMAN, last I checked, so it simply CANNOT be considered a promotion of the homosexual agenda from that reason alone). Now, if he had specifically had Ariel sing in Part of Your World wanting to mate with a girl, THEN I can see where it would be going regarding a promotion of the homosexual agenda. But as it is? Let me put it this way, I related to Ariel's desire due to my being autistic and ALSO going through a really rough development growing up because of it, and I'm straight, and very much conservative and Christian (even if my own personal views of God are by my own admission downright warped thanks to Raiders of the Lost Ark, with stuff like Dragon Ball Z, the Matrix, Metal Gear Solid 2, and heck, even Jonathan Edwards' sermon not helping with my views of God at all.). Heck, put another way, since I constantly have to keep my conservative views silent while at college and nearly let my professors brainwash me even WITH my critical thinking that my parents instilled into me, and having to put up with my bosses openly talking about their leftist agendas at my old job at GoodWill within earshot while I myself can't even so much as mention my conservative views in front of them, that if anything makes Ariel even MORE relatable to me than before. There's a difference between merely relating to a character for being an outcast while using as an offhand example being homosexual for what qualifies as an outcast (which can be interchangeable for stuff like Autistic as well, or even Christian and Conservative), and using a very specific framework that literally cannot be viewed in any other way (the latter being the problem with The Mob Song in Beauty and the Beast due to Don Hahn stating that Howard Ashman SPECIFICALLY used the whole anti-AIDS thing as the basis behind the villager's fear). Besides, they modeled Ursula after Divine, a notorious drag queen, and made her the bad guy. I'm pretty sure if they wanted to promote such an evil agenda, they would NOT do it with the actual villain (aka, the kind of person you're specifically meant to root AGAINST).

:As far as George Lucas, I never said it couldn't have been years later. I if anything said the exact opposite, that George Lucas lied about having always intended for it to be that (I even mentioned as a response to that bit that Lucas specifically wrote in the 1977 shooting script that Han Solo ultimately vaporized Greedo before he could fire). In fact, the writers' tendency to lie as a way of puffing themselves up is PRECISELY the reason why I intended to go to the SGA archives, specifically to make SURE they weren't puffing themselves up. The Vietcong bit is unfortunately actually always intended, since he made THAT clear in his 1973 first story draft, meaning unlike with Greedo shooting first, the Vietcong bit actually WAS backed up by development notes. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 22:02, July 11, 2022 (EDT)

:As far as George Lucas, I never said it couldn't have been years later. I if anything said the exact opposite, that George Lucas lied about having always intended for it to be that (I even mentioned as a response to that bit that Lucas specifically wrote in the 1977 shooting script that Han Solo ultimately vaporized Greedo before he could fire). In fact, the writers' tendency to lie as a way of puffing themselves up is PRECISELY the reason why I intended to go to the SGA archives, specifically to make SURE they weren't puffing themselves up. The Vietcong bit is unfortunately actually always intended, since he made THAT clear in his 1973 first story draft, meaning unlike with Greedo shooting first, the Vietcong bit actually WAS backed up by development notes. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 22:02, July 11, 2022 (EDT)