Changes

Line 97: Line 97:     
Yes, I read that and found it very discouraging and narrow minded.  Does this wiki make an attempt at objectivity, or is it simply a conservative partisan answer to its liberal partisan counterparts?  --[[User:ThunderBunny|ThunderBunny]] 03:03, 3 June 2007 (EDT)
 
Yes, I read that and found it very discouraging and narrow minded.  Does this wiki make an attempt at objectivity, or is it simply a conservative partisan answer to its liberal partisan counterparts?  --[[User:ThunderBunny|ThunderBunny]] 03:03, 3 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Again, theologians can be philosophers.  I am sorry if that understanding is too 'narrow minded' for you.  To answer your second questions, yes. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 04:25, 3 June 2007 (EDT)
    
== Answer ==
 
== Answer ==
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits