Changes

718 bytes added ,  20:19, June 5, 2007
no edit summary
Line 177: Line 177:  
: The ACLU challenges the constitutionality of laws all the time today, but it never asks for a guilty verdict. Do you have any other example where the ACLU asked for a guilty verdict? Any proof that people in the courtroom were not surprised by Darrow asking for a guilty verdict? Newspaper accounts did say that it was a surprise, and it goes against what the ACLU has done in every other case.
 
: The ACLU challenges the constitutionality of laws all the time today, but it never asks for a guilty verdict. Do you have any other example where the ACLU asked for a guilty verdict? Any proof that people in the courtroom were not surprised by Darrow asking for a guilty verdict? Newspaper accounts did say that it was a surprise, and it goes against what the ACLU has done in every other case.
 
: It is true that the judge ultimately ruled that Bryan's testimony was inadmissible, but only after listening to it. It is reasonable to assume that he would have done the same for Darrow's testimony. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:19, 5 June 2007 (EDT)
 
: It is true that the judge ultimately ruled that Bryan's testimony was inadmissible, but only after listening to it. It is reasonable to assume that he would have done the same for Darrow's testimony. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:19, 5 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Certainly, I have a source, which I gave in an attempt to fix the errors on the page (the repair was removed, as lies that make one feel good appear to be more valuable than the truth on this "encyclopedia".)  I recommend the book "The Great Monkey Trial," by L. Sprague de Camp, which quotes heavily from the trial transcript.  William Jennings Bryan's testimony was not over, and the judge ruled against further testimony by lawyers in the case.  Darrow did not refuse to testify--that's arrant nonsense, and so blatantly so as to make this page look like wish fulfillment.  I see, however, that the dedication to falsehood on this page is insurmountable.  Even Wikipedia is better than this! [[User:Scopesfan]]
    
== More on Gore ==
 
== More on Gore ==
    
I removed it again, without realizing there had been a previous discussion.  While I certainly loathe Gore, the addition just doesn't belong here.  If the boss wants to override me, fine, but other than that, the content simply belongs in a different article.  [[User:HeartOfGold|HeartOfGold]] 20:42, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
 
I removed it again, without realizing there had been a previous discussion.  While I certainly loathe Gore, the addition just doesn't belong here.  If the boss wants to override me, fine, but other than that, the content simply belongs in a different article.  [[User:HeartOfGold|HeartOfGold]] 20:42, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
5

edits