Changes

==Haaretz exposed==

==Haaretz exposed==

Per [[Haaretz]]' Amos Shocken (2008), there is no need for there to be any identity between the regime in Israel and the regime in South Africa called by that name.  Suffice it to say that the use of the word constitutes, in Schocken's opinion, "an absorbing and understandable media headline in large parts of the world, and is therefore useful for conveying the message."<ref>[https://mafyahu.wordpress.com/2017/04/20/%D7%90%D7%A0%D7%98%D7%99%D7%A9%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%91%D7%94%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%A5-2-%D7%94%D7%90%D7%9D-%D7%93%D7%99-%D7%9C%D7%94%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%93%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%95%D7%9F/ Antisemitism in Haaretz (2): Is it enough to show a "family resemblance" to Der Stürmer ("The Assailant")?  of course not].

Per [[Haaretz]]' Amos Shocken (2008),<ref>Haaretz (Hebrew), June 27, 2008.</ref> there is no need for there to be any identity between the regime in Israel and the regime in South Africa called by that name.  Suffice it to say that the use of the word constitutes, in Schocken's opinion, "an absorbing and understandable media headline in large parts of the world, and is therefore useful for conveying the message."<ref>[https://mafyahu.wordpress.com/2017/04/20/%D7%90%D7%A0%D7%98%D7%99%D7%A9%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%91%D7%94%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%A5-2-%D7%94%D7%90%D7%9D-%D7%93%D7%99-%D7%9C%D7%94%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%93%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%95%D7%9F/ Antisemitism in Haaretz (2): Is it enough to show a "family resemblance" to Der Stürmer ("The Assailant")?  of course not].

Apr 20, 2017.<blockquote>And when there were allegations against the generous use of this propaganda term, Schocken had an explanation.  Here is an article he published in his newspaper back in July 2008: "Among circles..." That is: to use the insult of "apartheid" against Israel, there is no need for there to be any identity between the regime in Israel and the regime in South Africa called by that name.  Suffice it to say that the use of the word constitutes, in Schocken's opinion, "an absorbing and understandable media headline in large parts of the world, and is therefore useful for conveying the message."</blockquote></ref> He knows there is no “apartheid” there, so he plays around with facts. He explains that it’s a catchy phrase.<ref>[https://www.e-mago.co.il/Editor/actual-2356.htm Haaretz newspaper incites again], Israel Bar-Nir, Maraah Magazine, 07/02/2008.<blockquote><font size=1>

Apr 20, 2017.<blockquote>And when there were allegations against the generous use of this propaganda term, Schocken had an explanation.  Here is an article he published in his newspaper back in July 2008: "Among circles..." That is: to use the insult of "apartheid" against Israel, there is no need for there to be any identity between the regime in Israel and the regime in South Africa called by that name.  Suffice it to say that the use of the word constitutes, in Schocken's opinion, "an absorbing and understandable media headline in large parts of the world, and is therefore useful for conveying the message."</blockquote></ref> He knows there is no “apartheid” there, so he plays around with facts. He explains that it’s a catchy phrase.<ref>[https://www.e-mago.co.il/Editor/actual-2356.htm Haaretz newspaper incites again], Israel Bar-Nir, Maraah Magazine, 07/02/2008.<blockquote><font size=1>

The "Haaretz" newspaper, in its last weekend edition, returned and incited against the State of Israel.  An editorial signed by, no less and no more, Amos Shocken, the editor of the newspaper, bears the title Israel the Apartheid[sic] State.

The "Haaretz" newspaper, in its last weekend edition, returned and incited against the State of Israel.  An editorial signed by, no less and no more, Amos Shocken, the editor of the newspaper, bears the title Israel the Apartheid[sic] State.

In conclusion, it is worth noting that in Egypt, our neighbor, as well as in Saudi Arabia, there are laws that prevent any Palestinian married to a citizen of that country from receiving the country's citizenship.  These laws apply to every Palestinian regardless of where he lives and what his status is, not only to those living in the territories of the Palestinian Authority, as well as to the descendants of such marriages.  To the best of my knowledge, similar laws are also found in the law books of other Arab countries.  Even there (at least in Lebanon and Jordan), the reasoning is - lo and behold - demographic.  Furthermore, there is no red carpet waiting for those who just want to come and live in one of those countries.</font></blockquote></ref>

In conclusion, it is worth noting that in Egypt, our neighbor, as well as in Saudi Arabia, there are laws that prevent any Palestinian married to a citizen of that country from receiving the country's citizenship.  These laws apply to every Palestinian regardless of where he lives and what his status is, not only to those living in the territories of the Palestinian Authority, as well as to the descendants of such marriages.  To the best of my knowledge, similar laws are also found in the law books of other Arab countries.  Even there (at least in Lebanon and Jordan), the reasoning is - lo and behold - demographic.  Furthermore, there is no red carpet waiting for those who just want to come and live in one of those countries.</font></blockquote></ref>

==Ben White - typical user==

==Ben White - typical user==