Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,143
edits
Changes
Conservapedia proven right (view source)
Revision as of 16:47, September 6, 2023
, 16:47, September 6, 2023no edit summary
|-
|-
|September 23, 2019
|September 23, 2019
|Conservapedia calls attention for the need to develop a missile defense system against drone swarms.<ref>https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/184#Saudi_Arabia</ref>
|Conservapedia calls attention for the need to develop a missile defense system against drone swarms.<ref>https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/184#Saudi_Arabia</ref> "Another problem is swarms of drones. If 50 long range cruise missile's were inbound, we know we could wipe out 60%+ of them; if a 1,000 small drones were launched just over the horizon, flying not much above tree-top level, that presents a new defensive problem that has not been combat tested yet."
|The US has the mightiest military on the planet.
|The US has the mightiest military on the planet.
|Stephen Bryen at the Center for Security Policy notes: "Today [[NATO]] is poorly equipped to deal with drone swarms or even defend against medium and long range missiles. Some of this is due to misdirected spending, where air defenses have been neglected or focused mainly on strategic nuclear threats. But even here, air defense coverage in Europe is far from adequate. Worse than that, what air defenses there are in NATO are not networked and not optimized to sort out threats and deal with the most lethal.<ref>[https://weapons.substack.com/p/is-nato-learning-about-its-future Is NATO Learning About Its Future in Ukraine? With Ukraine faltering, NATO needs to learn some lessons], STEPHEN BRYEN, ''Weapons and Strategy'', SEP 6, 2023.</ref>
|Stephen Bryen at the Center for Security Policy notes: "Today [[NATO]] is poorly equipped to deal with drone swarms or even defend against medium and long range missiles. Some of this is due to misdirected spending, where air defenses have been neglected or focused mainly on strategic nuclear threats. But even here, air defense coverage in Europe is far from adequate. Worse than that, what air defenses there are in NATO are not networked and not optimized to sort out threats and deal with the most lethal.<ref>[https://weapons.substack.com/p/is-nato-learning-about-its-future Is NATO Learning About Its Future in Ukraine? With Ukraine faltering, NATO needs to learn some lessons], STEPHEN BRYEN, ''Weapons and Strategy'', SEP 6, 2023.</ref>