Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,249
edits
Changes
Talk:Global fascism (view source)
Revision as of 20:37, September 7, 2023
, 20:37, September 7, 2023→I suggest moving this page title to "Global neofascism"
A nationalist labor union movement clamoring for a syndicate vanguard/federation to seize the means of production would probably be close to old-school Fascist ideology. Modern-day globalism isn't, and can at best be considered "neofascist." It is also worth noting that the neo-Marxist social agenda of contemporary globalists is contrary to the cultural social rigidity pursued by Italian Fascists (also a feature of Soviet Communism). Modern-day "moral degeneracy" can be traced to the [[New Left]], whose ideologues borrowed from the [[Frankfurt School]] led by [[Antonio Gramsci]], who tried to assassinate Mussolini. With this fact alone, designating a movement grounded in neo-Marxism as "fascist" is silly, seeing that neo-Marxists were not only antithetical to the social rigidity aspect of classical Fascism, but even violently attempted to overthrow Fascism in a age-old manifestation of intrasocialist conflict. It's also worth noting that neo-Marxists are not "Communists." Sure, Marxist–Leninist theory promoted moral degradation, but actual Communist regimes were culturally "national-conservative." —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 16:24, September 7, 2023 (EDT)
A nationalist labor union movement clamoring for a syndicate vanguard/federation to seize the means of production would probably be close to old-school Fascist ideology. Modern-day globalism isn't, and can at best be considered "neofascist." It is also worth noting that the neo-Marxist social agenda of contemporary globalists is contrary to the cultural social rigidity pursued by Italian Fascists (also a feature of Soviet Communism). Modern-day "moral degeneracy" can be traced to the [[New Left]], whose ideologues borrowed from the [[Frankfurt School]] led by [[Antonio Gramsci]], who tried to assassinate Mussolini. With this fact alone, designating a movement grounded in neo-Marxism as "fascist" is silly, seeing that neo-Marxists were not only antithetical to the social rigidity aspect of classical Fascism, but even violently attempted to overthrow Fascism in a age-old manifestation of intrasocialist conflict. It's also worth noting that neo-Marxists are not "Communists." Sure, Marxist–Leninist theory promoted moral degradation, but actual Communist regimes were culturally "national-conservative." —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 16:24, September 7, 2023 (EDT)
:Don't take any of comments as being the last word. But basically we've had this discussion on the [[Fascism]] talk page; fascism originally was an economic concept, that post-1939 acquired a different meaning in the Angelosphere anti-Nazi propaganda networks with quite a different meaning from its original context. And that revised meaning persists to this day, which, IMO, creates a lot of confusion.
:For now, I'd suggest creating a redirect [[Global neo-fascism]] to here until this concept gets worked out (and this also avoids creating more confusing by having to create a separate neo-fascism article to distinguish it from Global neo-fasicm). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 16:37, September 7, 2023 (EDT)