Changes

1 byte added ,  02:34, September 26, 2023
m
Line 222: Line 222:  
::::::In historical research, do some reading on "historical reasoning". Often times stuff like the ER puts out - while usually pretty well researched, is a condensed summation of a very large body of primary source and background material. And thus it is interpretative. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:23, September 25, 2023 (EDT)
 
::::::In historical research, do some reading on "historical reasoning". Often times stuff like the ER puts out - while usually pretty well researched, is a condensed summation of a very large body of primary source and background material. And thus it is interpretative. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:23, September 25, 2023 (EDT)
   −
::::::When LaRouche was alive, he was a guy who said point blank (paraphrasing) "The British Empire are the biggest dope dealers on the planet. The exported dope to China (beginning with the [[Opium Wars]]) causing China's Century of Humiliation." Now that sounds conspiratorial, and naturally the Queen of England, [[MI5]], [[BBC]] and their American allies pushed back, but the more you look at it, as simplistic it is and sounds, you can't just dismiss it as another crazy conspiracy theory. Especially the way the [[establishment]] reacted to him.
+
::::::When LaRouche was alive, he was a guy who said point blank (paraphrasing) "The British Empire are the biggest dope dealers on the planet. They exported dope to China (beginning with the [[Opium Wars]]) causing China's Century of Humiliation." Now that sounds conspiratorial, and naturally the Queen of England, [[MI5]], [[BBC]] and their American allies pushed back, but the more you look at it, as simplistic it is and sounds, you can't just dismiss it as another crazy conspiracy theory. Especially the way the [[establishment]] reacted to him.
 
::::::Thi is no defense of LaRouche or his statements. There's other subplots involved that sent him to prison. But why? He, like Trump, had a large following that listened to him and believed what he said. And the powers that be felt threatened by that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:32, September 25, 2023 (EDT)
 
::::::Thi is no defense of LaRouche or his statements. There's other subplots involved that sent him to prison. But why? He, like Trump, had a large following that listened to him and believed what he said. And the powers that be felt threatened by that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:32, September 25, 2023 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,417

edits