Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,765
edits
Changes
→What the H do you want and why do you keep trolling my talk page w/6,000 bytes of garbage?
{{Cquote|<big>'''Think about this: we're still trying to build aircraft carriers. Aircraft carriers are about as relevant to the modern world as horse cavalry was in World War II. Cavalry may have been great in the 19th century, but technology made it irrelevant. Hypersonic missiles, which both Russia and China have, make US aircraft carriers expendable. They'll be dead very quickly if they ever go into combat.'''</big>|||Larry Johnson, Oct. 3, 2023 [https://sonar21.com/hope-aint-a-plan/]}}
{{Cquote|<big>'''Think about this: we're still trying to build aircraft carriers. Aircraft carriers are about as relevant to the modern world as horse cavalry was in World War II. Cavalry may have been great in the 19th century, but technology made it irrelevant. Hypersonic missiles, which both Russia and China have, make US aircraft carriers expendable. They'll be dead very quickly if they ever go into combat.'''</big>|||Larry Johnson, Oct. 3, 2023 [https://sonar21.com/hope-aint-a-plan/]}}
::Consider:
::[https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2019/3/22/incoming-can-aircraft-carriers-survive-hypersonic-weapons Incoming: Can Aircraft Carriers Survive Hypersonic Weapons?]
::[https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2019/3/22/incoming-can-aircraft-carriers-survive-hypersonic-weapons Incoming: Can Aircraft Carriers Survive Hypersonic Weapons?]
::[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/05/25/chinese-df27-hypersonic-missile-us-aircraft-carriers/ No, Chinese hypersonic missiles have not made US aircraft carriers obsolete], The Telegraph, 2023
::[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/05/25/chinese-df27-hypersonic-missile-us-aircraft-carriers/ No, Chinese hypersonic missiles have not made US aircraft carriers obsolete], The Telegraph, 2023
::[https://theconversation.com/chinas-hypersonic-missiles-threaten-us-power-in-the-pacific-an-aerospace-engineer-explains-how-the-weapons-work-and-the-unique-threats-they-pose-206271#:~:text=Hypersonic%20missiles%20with%20conventional%2C%20non,outcome%20of%20a%20major%20conflict. China’s hypersonic missiles threaten US power in the Pacific – an aerospace engineer explains how the weapons work and the unique threats they pose]
::[https://theconversation.com/chinas-hypersonic-missiles-threaten-us-power-in-the-pacific-an-aerospace-engineer-explains-how-the-weapons-work-and-the-unique-threats-they-pose-206271#:~:text=Hypersonic%20missiles%20with%20conventional%2C%20non,outcome%20of%20a%20major%20conflict. China’s hypersonic missiles threaten US power in the Pacific – an aerospace engineer explains how the weapons work and the unique threats they pose] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:24, October 3, 2023 (EDT)
==Respect is earned==
==Respect is earned==
I'm going to be as peaceful as possible when I say this, RobSmith. If you want my respect, you have to make some changes to yourself. It's a simple two-way street; it's not and never has been one way, and you do know what I'm talking about. You respect the people in the website, I will respect you. Pretty simple. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 17:58, October 2, 2023 (EDT)
I'm going to be as peaceful as possible when I say this, RobSmith. If you want my respect, you have to make some changes to yourself. It's a simple two-way street; it's not and never has been one way, and you do know what I'm talking about. You respect the people in the website, I will respect you. Pretty simple. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 17:58, October 2, 2023 (EDT)