Changes

Line 183: Line 183:  
::I oppose the [[liberal]] [[double standard]], which is used often against [[conservatives]], that tries diminish our ranks by demonizing anyone who departs from liberals' stereotype of what a conservative should be.  Thirty years ago a conservative candidate for [[U.S. Senate]] in [[California]] was smeared for going to strip clubs for entertainment, which he freely admitted and which is hardly unusual in that [[Hollywood]]-supporting state.  Meanwhile, liberals' far worse conduct by their own is just fine.  I cannot support that double standard, and I do not think that asexual appearances and puritanical conduct are a requirement to be a conservative advocate, spokesperson or candidate.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 01:47, December 31, 2023 (EST)
 
::I oppose the [[liberal]] [[double standard]], which is used often against [[conservatives]], that tries diminish our ranks by demonizing anyone who departs from liberals' stereotype of what a conservative should be.  Thirty years ago a conservative candidate for [[U.S. Senate]] in [[California]] was smeared for going to strip clubs for entertainment, which he freely admitted and which is hardly unusual in that [[Hollywood]]-supporting state.  Meanwhile, liberals' far worse conduct by their own is just fine.  I cannot support that double standard, and I do not think that asexual appearances and puritanical conduct are a requirement to be a conservative advocate, spokesperson or candidate.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 01:47, December 31, 2023 (EST)
 
:::The Newsweek article is bait, and the Daily Signal took the bait and responded with [[cancel culture]]. It's not like she had a wardrobe malfunction or filmed herself having sex in a Senate hearing room to raise money for an election campaign. I don't recall Democrats or liberals having pangs of conscience over those matters. They just move on to the next, more outrageous scandal. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 02:29, December 31, 2023 (EST)
 
:::The Newsweek article is bait, and the Daily Signal took the bait and responded with [[cancel culture]]. It's not like she had a wardrobe malfunction or filmed herself having sex in a Senate hearing room to raise money for an election campaign. I don't recall Democrats or liberals having pangs of conscience over those matters. They just move on to the next, more outrageous scandal. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 02:29, December 31, 2023 (EST)
 +
 +
Its not only Amish, but every real conservative Christian and Catholic oppose [[Bikini]]
 +
 +
here what Saint Pope [[John Paul II]] wrote about this dress: A bikini does not reveal a woman's worth as a daughter of God. It does not reveal her brilliant mind, beautiful heart and eternal soul. It reveals only her body - and that is not nearly close enough to describing who she is as a child of God.
 +
    
I didnt call for cancelling her, I said she doesnt deserve nomination here. There are much more conservative who deserve to be in top tiers more than her
 
I didnt call for cancelling her, I said she doesnt deserve nomination here. There are much more conservative who deserve to be in top tiers more than her
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
8,746

edits