Changes

Is God's "Day" Billions of Human Years?
Line 9: Line 9:     
:But the fact of the matter is, it's their site, they can call it what they want and run it how they want.  People can get on here and post all they want about how it's not fair and balanced, how it is irresponsible, etc, but it isn't going to make a lick of difference for how this site is managed no matter how valid the complaints are.  The only real way to effect any kind of change on a site like this is if you are conservative, but bothered by the rampant YEC articles, or whatever, is to just state how this doesn't match your personal ideologies and and walk away.  I believe the atmosphere is too unstable to actually convert someone, and the end result will be like-minded people running a wiki for like-minded folks, and there is nothing wrong with that.  --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 16:03, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:But the fact of the matter is, it's their site, they can call it what they want and run it how they want.  People can get on here and post all they want about how it's not fair and balanced, how it is irresponsible, etc, but it isn't going to make a lick of difference for how this site is managed no matter how valid the complaints are.  The only real way to effect any kind of change on a site like this is if you are conservative, but bothered by the rampant YEC articles, or whatever, is to just state how this doesn't match your personal ideologies and and walk away.  I believe the atmosphere is too unstable to actually convert someone, and the end result will be like-minded people running a wiki for like-minded folks, and there is nothing wrong with that.  --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 16:03, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:"Day". Could the 7 "days " in which God created the earth (Genesis, English translation, ? from Hebrew, from?)
 +
have as accurately been translated as "epoch" or "period of time"? Is the only valid translation "one revolution of the earth"? If God's "day" could be a billion years, 365 billion revolutions of the earth (and I do not see why not), all conflict with science on this point disappears. LA Times recent selection to put-down conservatives becomes moot.
 +
[User: Howard Long, conservative scientist, June 22 2007 9AM PDT
8

edits