Changes

640 bytes added ,  21:11, July 5, 2024
improved
Line 1: Line 1:  
A '''terminal disclaimer''' in [[patent]] law is explained by section 1490 of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure:
 
A '''terminal disclaimer''' in [[patent]] law is explained by section 1490 of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure:
 
{{cquote|A disclaimer is a statement filed by an owner ... of a patent or of a patent to be granted, in which said owner relinquishes certain legal rights to the patent. ... [A] terminal disclaimer under 37 CFR 1.321(a) and (b) [is] used to disclaim or dedicate a portion or the entire term of all of the claims of a patent.}}
 
{{cquote|A disclaimer is a statement filed by an owner ... of a patent or of a patent to be granted, in which said owner relinquishes certain legal rights to the patent. ... [A] terminal disclaimer under 37 CFR 1.321(a) and (b) [is] used to disclaim or dedicate a portion or the entire term of all of the claims of a patent.}}
 +
 +
The purpose of a terminal disclaimer is to extend the lifetime of a patent:
 +
{{cquote|First, we note that an [obviousness-type double patenting] ODP determination depends on an assessment of obviousness, i.e., whether the claims of a later-expiring patent would have been obvious over the claims of an earlier-expiring patent owned by the same party. If so, absent a terminal disclaimer, the later-expiring claims are invalid. Application of that determination requires determining which is the later-expiring patent, which is why the date when PTA or PTE is applied matters.}}
 +
''In re Cellect, LLC'', 81 F.4th 1216, 1226 (Fed. Cir. 2023).
    
As explained further the [[Federal Circuit]]:
 
As explained further the [[Federal Circuit]]:
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,445

edits