Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
113 bytes added ,  21:40, June 23, 2007
no edit summary
Line 41: Line 41:     
:Rubbish. Firstly, it was actually Moritz Steinschneider who "coined" the phrase, in 1860. Marr used the phrase in 1879 in his book "The Way to Victory of Germanicism over Judaism" not to be polite, but to lend his race-hate work with an air of scientific credibility, linking it to the pseudo-science of Heinrich von Treitschke and his tracts on the racial superority of "Aryans" over the "Semitic" - another pseudo-scientific term - race, which, in his use, consisted solely of Jews. The words themselves are neologisms, which have never been used in ANY other context. Your "issue" with the term is foundless. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 09:23, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:Rubbish. Firstly, it was actually Moritz Steinschneider who "coined" the phrase, in 1860. Marr used the phrase in 1879 in his book "The Way to Victory of Germanicism over Judaism" not to be polite, but to lend his race-hate work with an air of scientific credibility, linking it to the pseudo-science of Heinrich von Treitschke and his tracts on the racial superority of "Aryans" over the "Semitic" - another pseudo-scientific term - race, which, in his use, consisted solely of Jews. The words themselves are neologisms, which have never been used in ANY other context. Your "issue" with the term is foundless. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 09:23, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Agreed, it is pseudo-scientific; however, why use a term in this day and age which is more or less incorrect?
4

edits

Navigation menu