Changes

== Examples ==

== Examples ==

#Ask Google, "did Jesus write the Epistle to the Hebrews," and its AI program responds, "No, scholars generally agree that Jesus did not write the Epistle to the Hebrews." But almost no scholars have addressed whether [[Jesus]] wrote it, and no other author capable of writing this masterpiece has been plausibly identified. See [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews]]?

#Ask Google, "did Jesus write the Epistle to the Hebrews," and its AI program responds, "No, scholars generally agree that Jesus did not write the Epistle to the Hebrews." But almost no scholars have addressed whether [[Jesus]] wrote it, and no other author capable of writing this masterpiece has been plausibly identified. See [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews]]?

Ask [[Elon Musk]]'s Grok about who will win the [[birthright citizenship]] case before the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], and Grok falsely explains:

#Ask [[Elon Musk]]'s Grok about who will win the [[birthright citizenship]] case before the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], and Grok falsely explains:

{{cquote|Legal Precedent: The 1898 case ''[[United States v. Wong Kim Ark]]'' affirmed that children born in the [[U.S.]] to non-citizen parents (not in diplomatic roles) are citizens under the [[14th Amendment]] [FALSE, AS THE PARENTS WERE LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS]. This precedent strongly supports birthright citizenship [FALSE, AS MOST PEOPLE ASSERTING BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP WERE BORN TO PARENTS WHO WERE NOT LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS], and multiple lower courts have ruled Trump’s order unconstitutional based on this doctrine. Overturning ''Wong Kim Ark'' would be a significant shift, requiring a compelling new interpretation of the [[14th Amendment]]. [FALSE]}}

{{cquote|Legal Precedent: The 1898 case ''[[United States v. Wong Kim Ark]]'' affirmed that children born in the [[U.S.]] to non-citizen parents (not in diplomatic roles) are citizens under the [[14th Amendment]] [FALSE, AS THE PARENTS WERE LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS]. This precedent strongly supports birthright citizenship [FALSE, AS MOST PEOPLE ASSERTING BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP WERE BORN TO PARENTS WHO WERE NOT LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS], and multiple lower courts have ruled Trump’s order unconstitutional based on this doctrine. Overturning ''Wong Kim Ark'' would be a significant shift, requiring a compelling new interpretation of the [[14th Amendment]]. [FALSE]}}

== See also ==

== See also ==