| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | Honest biblical scholars are not experts in the trickery of [[liberal style]] and, as a result, the scholars allow absurd claims of a late authorship to gain unjustified favor. | | Honest biblical scholars are not experts in the trickery of [[liberal style]] and, as a result, the scholars allow absurd claims of a late authorship to gain unjustified favor. |
| | | | |
| − | There are ten (10) reasons why the date of authorship of the [[Gospel of Mark]] was soon after the [[Resurrection]], or even prior to it as an ongoing account: | + | There are eleven (11) reasons why the date of authorship of the [[Gospel of Mark]] was soon after the [[Resurrection]], or even prior to it as an ongoing account: |
| | *early in [[Paul]]'s ministry, not long after the [[Resurrection]], he quoted from the [[Gospel of Mark]] concerning "the sandals of whose feet I <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[John the Baptist]]<nowiki>]</nowiki> am not worthy to untie" {{bibleref|Acts|13|25}} ([[ESV]]) (taken from {{bibleref|Mark|1|7}}) | | *early in [[Paul]]'s ministry, not long after the [[Resurrection]], he quoted from the [[Gospel of Mark]] concerning "the sandals of whose feet I <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[John the Baptist]]<nowiki>]</nowiki> am not worthy to untie" {{bibleref|Acts|13|25}} ([[ESV]]) (taken from {{bibleref|Mark|1|7}}) |
| | *the [[Gospel of Mark]], without the [[Mark ending]] apparently added later, omits subsequent events after the [[Resurrection]], implying that it was finalized with the Resurrection; | | *the [[Gospel of Mark]], without the [[Mark ending]] apparently added later, omits subsequent events after the [[Resurrection]], implying that it was finalized with the Resurrection; |
| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| | *the availability of [[scribe]]s made it possible, even likely, that a disciple of [[Jesus]] dictated regularly to a scribe as the events unfolded; | | *the availability of [[scribe]]s made it possible, even likely, that a disciple of [[Jesus]] dictated regularly to a scribe as the events unfolded; |
| | *the Gospel of Mark is by an [[Mark the eyewitness|eyewitness]], many of who were killed or scattered soon after the Resurrection, and would not be expected to have a long, modern-type lifespan; | | *the Gospel of Mark is by an [[Mark the eyewitness|eyewitness]], many of who were killed or scattered soon after the Resurrection, and would not be expected to have a long, modern-type lifespan; |
| − | *this Gospel has no preface, introduction or background, just as a daily log or diary would not, and this implies it was not a book written later but rather an ongoing account written and circulated at the time (but without letter authorities know about it, lest they seize it); and | + | *this Gospel has no preface, introduction or background, just as a daily log or diary would not, and this implies it was not a book written later but rather an ongoing account written and circulated at the time (but without letter authorities know about it, lest they seize it); |
| | + | *only this Gospel begins by calling itself "news", namely the "good news" ("gospel"), which suggests timeliness of the reporting rather than a retrospective or historical account; and |
| | *the Gospel of Mark uses εὐθὺς 41 times, compared with only 10 times in the rest of the entire [[New Testament]], and the translation of εὐθὺς as "immediately ..." seems off: instead, it should be recognized as a term used for a contemporaneous account of events, as in "now ...". | | *the Gospel of Mark uses εὐθὺς 41 times, compared with only 10 times in the rest of the entire [[New Testament]], and the translation of εὐθὺς as "immediately ..." seems off: instead, it should be recognized as a term used for a contemporaneous account of events, as in "now ...". |
| | == Nonsensical Liberal Theories == | | == Nonsensical Liberal Theories == |