Changes

another example
Line 6: Line 6:  
{{cquote|Legal Precedent: The 1898 case ''[[United States v. Wong Kim Ark]]'' affirmed that children born in the [[U.S.]] to non-citizen parents (not in diplomatic roles) are citizens under the [[14th Amendment]] [FALSE, AS THE PARENTS WERE LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS]. This precedent strongly supports birthright citizenship [FALSE, AS MOST PEOPLE ASSERTING BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP WERE BORN TO PARENTS WHO WERE NOT LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS], and multiple lower courts have ruled Trump’s order unconstitutional based on this doctrine. Overturning ''Wong Kim Ark'' would be a significant shift, requiring a compelling new interpretation of the [[14th Amendment]]. [FALSE]}}
 
{{cquote|Legal Precedent: The 1898 case ''[[United States v. Wong Kim Ark]]'' affirmed that children born in the [[U.S.]] to non-citizen parents (not in diplomatic roles) are citizens under the [[14th Amendment]] [FALSE, AS THE PARENTS WERE LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS]. This precedent strongly supports birthright citizenship [FALSE, AS MOST PEOPLE ASSERTING BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP WERE BORN TO PARENTS WHO WERE NOT LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS], and multiple lower courts have ruled Trump’s order unconstitutional based on this doctrine. Overturning ''Wong Kim Ark'' would be a significant shift, requiring a compelling new interpretation of the [[14th Amendment]]. [FALSE]}}
 
<ol><li value="3">Ask Google's AI mode: abortion "breast cancer", and it falsely states "Current scientific evidence does not support a link between induced abortion (elective abortion) and an increased risk of breast cancer," when the evidence for a link is overwhelming and proven by studies dating back many decades.</li></ol>
 
<ol><li value="3">Ask Google's AI mode: abortion "breast cancer", and it falsely states "Current scientific evidence does not support a link between induced abortion (elective abortion) and an increased risk of breast cancer," when the evidence for a link is overwhelming and proven by studies dating back many decades.</li></ol>
−
 
+
<ol><li value="4">Google AI falsely states, "The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in [Wong Kim Ark's] favor in 1898, establishing that anyone born within the US, regardless of their parents' citizenship or immigration status, is a US citizen." The Supreme Court held nothing of this sort.  Instead, it held that someone born in the U.S. to legal permanent residents in the U.S. who also held citizenship in [[China]], is a U.S. citizen.
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
 
* [https://www.brookings.edu/articles/comparing-google-bard-with-openais-chatgpt-on-political-bias-facts-and-morality/ Darrell M. West, "Comparing Google Bard with OpenAI’s ChatGPT on political bias, facts, and morality," Brookings Institute (Mar. 23, 2023)]
 
* [https://www.brookings.edu/articles/comparing-google-bard-with-openais-chatgpt-on-political-bias-facts-and-morality/ Darrell M. West, "Comparing Google Bard with OpenAI’s ChatGPT on political bias, facts, and morality," Brookings Institute (Mar. 23, 2023)]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,393

edits