270
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 77:
Line 77: + + + +
→Regarding locking the page: Comments from Admin/SYSOP with the username Conservative
3. I have looked at creationists Ray Martinez's work in the past and I know that he can produce good work. However, I looked at Ray Martinez's version briefly and immediately ran across unencyclopedic language. For example, I found this unencyclopedic: A critical view of Darwinists '''in sheeps clothing''' I also think you should have used footnotes instead of a bibliography since the evo/creo issue can be contentious.
3. I have looked at creationists Ray Martinez's work in the past and I know that he can produce good work. However, I looked at Ray Martinez's version briefly and immediately ran across unencyclopedic language. For example, I found this unencyclopedic: A critical view of Darwinists '''in sheeps clothing''' I also think you should have used footnotes instead of a bibliography since the evo/creo issue can be contentious.
: The first thing I said in ''Discussion'' was that all source cites would follow shortly. As far as terminology goes; the page was intended as sharp and blunt sword swings. I will not pursue this anymore. My work will appear on my own Wiki site in the near future - a site which will feature a topic and two views side by side. I realize that my hard line Creationism is too hot to handle and I am comforted that what I wrote made Darwinists see red and froth at the mouth.
[[User:Ray Martinez|Ray Martinez]] 19:42, 8 March 2007 (EST)
4. I don't think theistic evolution should be such a contentious issue as far as what it is if you stick to the facts. I suggest the two diametrically opposed sides stick to the facts and scrupuously footnote this article since it is becoming contentious.
4. I don't think theistic evolution should be such a contentious issue as far as what it is if you stick to the facts. I suggest the two diametrically opposed sides stick to the facts and scrupuously footnote this article since it is becoming contentious.