Changes

==NO==

==NO==

From what I have seen, Conservapedia was set up in response to two features of Wikipedia which did not appeal to those who would create this site:

From what I have seen, Conservapedia was set up in response to two features of Wikipedia which did not appeal to those who would create this site:

''*1.  a percieved liberal bias on Wikipedia, with Conservapedia claiming Wikipedia to be six times more liberal than the American public, and

''

*1.  a percieved liberal bias on Wikipedia, with Conservapedia claiming Wikipedia to be six times more liberal than the American public, and

*2.  the feeling that the majority of articles on Wikipedia are not befitting a website designing itself as an encyclopedia. Examples that have been given are the Wikipedia articles on the word "duh", obscure music bands and arcane British royalty.''

*2.  the feeling that the majority of articles on Wikipedia are not befitting a website designing itself as an encyclopedia. Examples that have been given are the Wikipedia articles on the word "duh", obscure music bands and arcane British royalty.''

I would first like to make it clear that I am not attempting to promote Wikipedia or demean Conservapedia in any way. I would like to take these two arguments and discuss the flaws I see in them, and I hope that other individuals on this site, whether they agree with me or not, can conduct this discussion fairly.

I would first like to make it clear that I am not attempting to promote Wikipedia or demean Conservapedia in any way. I would like to take these two arguments and discuss the flaws I see in them, and I hope that other individuals on this site, whether they agree with me or not, can conduct this discussion fairly.