Changes

On election eve, Rob's hit piece on Hillary Clinton hit #16 on [[Google]], with the first 15 results largely being cut n pastes from Hillary's own website and [[propaganda]] campaign.

On election eve, Rob's hit piece on Hillary Clinton hit #16 on [[Google]], with the first 15 results largely being cut n pastes from Hillary's own website and [[propaganda]] campaign.

But the question remained, "Why was Rob so dishonorably discharged under false pretenses in 2011?" The reason apparently was quite simple: in the toxic environment between Conservapedoia and Rationalwiki editors, Rob had always maintained an aire of [[civility]]. and could discuss serious differing points of view on subjects he was knowledgeable or, and did not engage in senseless, meanspirited food fights as such discussions always degenerated into between. There was even an aire of respect between the two o[p[posing positions. For this reason - because Rob could engage in civil discussions with opponents, he was de-sysoped. The immediate cause was when a RationaWiki editor at the RationaWiki website asked Rob if he thought User:Conservative was "mentally ill". As per Conservapedia Guidelines and its Administrator's Guide page outline, Rob did not respond. Indeed, Rob viewed it as just another [[provocation]] and didn't hold an opinion on the subject.

But the question remained, "Why was Rob so dishonorably discharged under false pretenses in 2011?" The reason apparently was quite simple: in the toxic environment between Conservapedia and Rationalwiki editors, Robwas able to maintain an aire of [[civility]]. Rob could discuss serious differing points of view on subjects he was knowledgeable or, and did not engage in senseless, meanspirited food fights as such discussions always degenerated into between. There was even an aire of respect between the two o[p[posing positions. For this reason - because Rob could engage in civil discussions with opponents, he was de-sysoped. The immediate cause was when a RationaWiki editor at the RationaWiki website asked Rob if he thought User:Conservative was "mentally ill". As per Conservapedia Guidelines and its Administrator's Guide page outline, Rob did not respond. Indeed, Rob viewed it as just another [[provocation]] and didn't hold an opinion on the subject.

But it didn't end there. User:Conservative, fearing that "word would get out" from others who had interacted with him and knew his editing practices much better than Rob did, retaliated against the rumors by attacking Rob for his civil engagement with RationalWiki editors. Rob had collaborated with user:Conservative on a few pages in 2007 and saw how his research was misused and his pointless, silly interaction with other users, Rob withdrew from any further collaboration and limited interaction in the future. The record of [[leak]]ed emails of the Conservapedia sysop (leaked by User:TK and hacked by User:AceMcWicked) show virtually no interaction between Rob and User:Conservative between 2008 and to 2015. User:Conservative, in fact, was not a member of Andy Schlafly's original "brain trust" in 2007 as other sysops commented that he was a bit odd.

But it didn't end there. User:Conservative, fearing that "word would get out" from others who had interacted with him and knew his editing practices much better than Rob did, retaliated against the rumors by attacking Rob for his civil engagement with RationalWiki editors. Rob had collaborated with user:Conservative on a few pages in 2007 and saw how his research was misused and his pointless, silly interaction with other users, Rob withdrew from any further collaboration and limited interaction in the future. The record of [[leak]]ed emails of the Conservapedia sysop (leaked by User:TK and hacked by User:AceMcWicked) show virtually no interaction between Rob and User:Conservative between 2008 and to 2015. User:Conservative, in fact, was not a member of Andy Schlafly's original "brain trust" in 2007 as other sysops commented that he was a bit odd.