''[[The Washington Post]]'' claimed the Poseidon underwater drone "defies traditional classification." Michael Petersen, senior research scientist at the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) in the [[U.S.]], described Poseidon as a "Franken-weapon" — a system that combines elements of various types of armaments. According to Petersen, Poseidon "sits somewhere between a [[torpedo]] and an unmanned [[submarine]]," capable of carrying a [[nuclear war]]head and powered by a [[nuclear reactor]] that allows it to cross [[ocean]]s at virtually unlimited range. He added that Poseidon is intended as a second-strike [[weapon]] — designed for retaliatory use in the event of a [[nuclear war]]. | ''[[The Washington Post]]'' claimed the Poseidon underwater drone "defies traditional classification." Michael Petersen, senior research scientist at the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) in the [[U.S.]], described Poseidon as a "Franken-weapon" — a system that combines elements of various types of armaments. According to Petersen, Poseidon "sits somewhere between a [[torpedo]] and an unmanned [[submarine]]," capable of carrying a [[nuclear war]]head and powered by a [[nuclear reactor]] that allows it to cross [[ocean]]s at virtually unlimited range. He added that Poseidon is intended as a second-strike [[weapon]] — designed for retaliatory use in the event of a [[nuclear war]]. |