SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
541
edits
Changes
Essay:Worst Liberal Movies (view source)
Revision as of 00:24, December 29, 2025
, 00:24, December 29, 2025→Animated Films
|2010
|2010
|PG
|PG
|This animated film about wolves promotes disorderly conduct based on the zany antics of an omega wolf named Humphrey. It can also be seen as pro-environmentalist because some members of the wolf pack try to start eating berries instead of caribou, despite wolves being natural carnivores. Alpha wolves are painted in an elitist light for being determined and hardworking. One female wolf named Kate can be described as a modern feminist. Similar to the other liberal film, ''Open Season,'' it spawned multiple unneeded direct-to-video sequels. It is also somewhat comparable to the other liberal film called ''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals'', but in that movie's case, it had a subsequent television series called ''Back at the Barnyard'' instead of film sequels.
|This animated film about wolves promotes disorderly conduct based on the zany antics of an omega wolf named Humphrey. It can also be seen as pro-environmentalist because some members of the wolf pack try to start eating berries instead of caribou, despite wolves being natural carnivores. Alpha wolves are portrayed in an elitist light for being determined and hardworking. One female wolf named Kate can be described as a modern feminist. Similar to the other liberal film, ''Open Season,'' it spawned multiple unneeded direct-to-video sequels. It is also somewhat comparable to the other liberal film, ''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals'', but in that movie's case, it had a subsequent television series, ''Back at the Barnyard'', rather than film sequels.
|$25,107,267
|$25,107,267
|-
|-
|These direct-to-video sequels follow the characters from the first ''Alpha and Omega'' movie and show the same themes from that film. The sequels encourage disobedient behavior, for the pups of Kate and Humphrey often ignore their parents telling them to stay at home; they even try justifying this by telling their parents in the sixth movie that they get into "situations" by being told to be kind and caring. An instance of racism is shown in the fifth film by three porcupines being told to be friends because they look alike.
|These direct-to-video sequels follow the characters from the first ''Alpha and Omega'' movie and show the same themes from that film. The sequels encourage disobedient behavior, for the pups of Kate and Humphrey often ignore their parents telling them to stay at home; they even try justifying this by telling their parents in the sixth movie that they get into "situations" by being told to be kind and caring. An instance of racism is shown in the fifth film by three porcupines being told to be friends because they look alike.
|N/A (Direct to Video)
|N/A (Direct to Video)
|-
|''Animal Farm''
|To debut in 2026
|PG
|Shockingly distributed by Angel Studios, Andy Serkis's adaptation for ''Animal Farm'' seems to go against a lot of what the original story stood for: becoming a generic kids' movie with a sinister undertone. This cautionary tale about communism has been turned into a screed against capitalism, with Pilkington (reimagined as a woman for this adaptation) being a blatant expy of Elon Musk. This also implies that the pigs only turned evil because of capitalism. It was met with complete derision by both sides of the political aisle, some joking that the windmill in the movie would be a generator fueled by Orwell "rolling in his grave."
|TBA
|-
|-
|''Animals United'' (Konferenz der Tiere in German)
|''Animals United'' (Konferenz der Tiere in German)
|2010
|2010
|PG
|PG
|A goofy meerkat and a pacifistic lion journey with other animals from around the world (a polar bear, two tortoises, a kangaroo, a Tasmanian devil, and a rooster) to take down a dam built by humans, which had caused the Okavango Delta to dry up. This movie, based on a children's book, promotes a heavy environmentalist message, with the animals saying that all humans are causing bad things to happen worldwide (like causing a polar bear's snowy home to melt and letting the Outback catch on fire). The movie's ending amps the environmental message up to eleven, with many animals storming the cities and news reporters saying that the animals will make humans pay for ruining the world.
|A goofy meerkat and a pacifistic lion journey with other animals from around the world (a polar bear, two tortoises, a kangaroo, a Tasmanian devil, and a rooster) to take down a dam built by humans, which had caused the Okavango Delta to dry up. This movie, based on a children's book, promotes a heavy environmentalist message, with the animals saying that all humans are causing harm worldwide (like causing a polar bear's snowy home to melt and letting the Outback catch on fire). The movie's ending amps up the environmental message to eleven, with many animals storming the cities and news reporters saying the animals will make humans pay for ruining the world.
|£2,133,051
|£2,133,051
|-
|-
|2011
|2011
|PG
|PG
Like the first ''Happy Feet'', this penguin movie does not push the envelope too much in terms of sexual humor, but it goes even further with environmental themes, pushing the global warming agenda. Staunch liberal actors Matt Damon and Brad Pitt voice two krill who are implied to be homosexual.<ref name="6 Kids Films Filled with Green Propaganda" />
|$64,006,466
|$64,006,466
|-
|-
|2015
|2015
|PG
|PG
|Contains environmental, illegal immigration messages, and somewhat supports the homosexual agenda as well. The male alien cross dresses, and well as potty humor it featured. Also rejects hierarchy and tradition.
|Contains environmental, illegal immigration messages, and somewhat supports the homosexual agenda as well. The male alien cross-dresses, and it features plenty of potty humor. The film also rejects hierarchy and tradition.
|$177,397,510
|$177,397,510
|-
|-
|1999
|1999
|Not Rated
|Not Rated
|This animation bastardizes a horrific, tragic historical event in the name of making a statement against the whaling industry. It even has a sequel in 2004, which is not only horrible but also flat-out bizarre.
|This animation bastardizes a horrific, tragic historical event in the name of making a statement against the whaling industry. It even has a 2004 sequel, which is not only horrible but also flat-out bizarre.
|
|
|-
|-
|2015
|2015
|PG
|PG
|This spinoff prequel to the ''Despicable Me'' films begins with the "evolution" of the minions, which flies in the face of the creationist truth. The film shows the minions evolving from single-cell organisms in the ocean, suggesting that God does not exist. This film also glorifies criminality. Not to mention it seems to sympathize with a family that has robbed a bank, an action which is congruent with the liberal idea of not working hard for wealth. A sequel was released in 2022 called ''The Rise of Gru''.
|This spinoff prequel to the ''Despicable Me'' films begins with the "evolution" of the minions, which flies in the face of the creationist truth. The film shows the minions evolving from single-cell organisms in the ocean, suggesting that God does not exist. This film also glorifies criminality. Not to mention, it seems to sympathize with a family that has robbed a bank, an action which is congruent with the liberal idea of not working hard for wealth. A sequel was released in 2022 called ''The Rise of Gru''.
|$1.159 billion
|$1.159 billion
|-
|-
|2016
|2016
|PG
|PG
This poorly received animation casts an environmentalist polar bear as the hero and vilifies major businesses through a greedy real estate mogul, in a possible jab at Donald Trump. Three sequels promoting the same environmental message have been released since 2019.
|$24.8 million
|$24.8 million
|-
|-
|2018
|2018
|G
|G
|The movie was a complete trashing of the popular British children's book series of the same name, promoting environmentalism by having the rightful owner of the farm, Thomas MacGregor, be vilified simply for trying to farm the vegetable garden that legally belonged to him. At the same time, the various wild animals are portrayed positively in interfering with his business. One of their plans against MacGregor even goes so far as to have Peter Rabbit murder him by exploiting a food allergy that he had, and it is treated positively. It was such that even the liberal website [[TV Tropes]] grudgingly acknowledged under the articles "Unintentionally Sympathetic" and "Unintentionally Unsympathetic" that Thomas was closer to being in the right than Peter and his friends were. A sequel - ''Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway'' - was released in 2021.
|The movie was a complete trashing of the popular British children's book series of the same name, promoting environmentalism by having the rightful owner of the farm, Thomas MacGregor, be vilified simply for trying to farm the vegetable garden that legally belonged to him. At the same time, the various wild animals are portrayed positively in interfering with his business. One of their plans against MacGregor even goes so far as to have Peter Rabbit murder him by exploiting a food allergy that he had, and it is treated positively. It was such that even the liberal website [[TV Tropes]] grudgingly acknowledged, in the articles "Unintentionally Sympathetic" and "Unintentionally Unsympathetic," that Thomas was closer to being in the right than Peter and his friends were. A sequel - ''Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway'' - was released in 2021.
|$146,983,492
|$146,983,492
|-
|-
|This feminist story follows a highly fictionalized account of the life of [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message; and the Native American’s view against English settlers is similar to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would enter public knowledge and provided to universities, colleges, and high schools across America two years later (see ''Good Will Hunting''). The titular character enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over fellow Native American Kokoum, and her decision is treated in a comparatively positive light; while the English settlers are vilified simply for establishing the early American colonies to find Jamestown, and John Ratcliffe in particular was demonized as having the motive of trying to establish a gold mine and being greedy, despite gold never being the motive for Ratcliffe, which could be interpreted as a dig against capitalism. Also, unlike the film character, who was the victim of a mutiny, the real one was killed in an ambush by Powhatan Indians in 1609, along with 14 other men.
|This feminist story follows a highly fictionalized account of the life of [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message; and the Native American’s view against English settlers is similar to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would enter public knowledge and provided to universities, colleges, and high schools across America two years later (see ''Good Will Hunting''). The titular character enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over fellow Native American Kokoum, and her decision is treated in a comparatively positive light; while the English settlers are vilified simply for establishing the early American colonies to find Jamestown, and John Ratcliffe in particular was demonized as having the motive of trying to establish a gold mine and being greedy, despite gold never being the motive for Ratcliffe, which could be interpreted as a dig against capitalism. Also, unlike the film character, who was the victim of a mutiny, the real one was killed in an ambush by Powhatan Indians in 1609, along with 14 other men.
Following the Best Picture nomination of ''Beauty and the Beast'' at the 64th Academy Awards and its subsequent loss in March 1992, then-studio chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg opted to produce another animated sweeping romantic epic in hopes of achieving a cinematic masterpiece status and replicating another Best Picture nomination, even if he intended to distort history and add both a love story and environmental themes. In fact, many people at Disney had high hopes for ''Pocahontas'', while deeming the concept of another film in production, ''The Lion King'' as experimental. To their surprise, ''The Lion King'' became one of the greatest animated motion pictures of all time, while ''Pocahontas'' received mixed critical reviews and below-than-expected box office receipts.
Following the Best Picture nomination of ''Beauty and the Beast'' at the 64th Academy Awards and its subsequent loss in March 1992, then-studio chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg opted to produce another animated sweeping romantic epic in hopes of achieving a cinematic masterpiece status and replicating another Best Picture nomination, even if he intended to distort history and add both a love story and environmental themes. In fact, many people at Disney had high hopes for ''Pocahontas'', while deeming the concept of another film in production, ''The Lion King'' as experimental. To their surprise, ''The Lion King'' became one of the greatest animated motion pictures of all time, while ''Pocahontas'' received mixed critical reviews and below-expected box office receipts.
|$141,579,773
|$141,579,773
|-
|-