Changes

no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:  
The formula [[E=mc²]] has several logical flaws.  Here is the growing list:
 
The formula [[E=mc²]] has several logical flaws.  Here is the growing list:
   −
*even [[liberal]] [[Google]] [[AI]] admits that "a single, overarching theory that reconciles the two frameworks [of mass and energy]] remains elusive," and thus the equation E=mc² is implausible in equating light and matter despite Google AI asserting that the equation is true.
+
*even [[liberal]] [[Google]] [[AI]] admits that "a single, overarching theory that reconciles the two frameworks [of mass and energy] remains elusive," and thus the equation E=mc² is implausible in equating light and matter despite Google AI asserting that the equation is true.
 
*the speed of light is probably changing over time.  But according to the formula, a mass at constant energy would change precisely in inverse proportion squared of any change in the speed of light!
 
*the speed of light is probably changing over time.  But according to the formula, a mass at constant energy would change precisely in inverse proportion squared of any change in the speed of light!
 
*the formula falsely implies that it is impossible for matter to increase its energy without increasing its mass in direct proportion.
 
*the formula falsely implies that it is impossible for matter to increase its energy without increasing its mass in direct proportion.
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,552

edits