270
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 279:
Line 279: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→YOUR EDIT WAS NEGATED
*But his inflamatory remarks, many of them, were posted way before any Sysop here, other than Conservative, asked him to tone it down, Rob. That's the point. And when he was blocked for a brief few hours for it, he came back spouting more. And, are you saying anyone, even a sysop, hurtling an insult, even one made in the edit notes, that makes it okay for a user to come back with more? That two wrongs make a right? Interesting logic there. I ask that you please stop with the public insults and ridicule of other sysops publicly, as Andy has requested. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 21:29, 3 July 2007 (EDT)
*But his inflamatory remarks, many of them, were posted way before any Sysop here, other than Conservative, asked him to tone it down, Rob. That's the point. And when he was blocked for a brief few hours for it, he came back spouting more. And, are you saying anyone, even a sysop, hurtling an insult, even one made in the edit notes, that makes it okay for a user to come back with more? That two wrongs make a right? Interesting logic there. I ask that you please stop with the public insults and ridicule of other sysops publicly, as Andy has requested. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 21:29, 3 July 2007 (EDT)
:*You've never presented any evidence where it occurred. And you've been asked several times now. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:32, 3 July 2007 (EDT)
:*You've never presented any evidence where it occurred. And you've been asked several times now. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:32, 3 July 2007 (EDT)
----
==NonXtianConservative==
This person is an admitted liberal sock. Read him admission here:[http://groups.google.com/group/talk.origins/msg/61f0be62fc7d90a3]
June 19, 2007
NonXtianConservative wrote:
> > As far as the sock puppet comment, I'm
> > not suggesting that you're a sock puppet, I'm rather admitting that I
> > am (in fact, I am several sock puppets at CP). It's rather fun to put
> > in all these seemingly conservative edits which are completely
> > ridiculous. I would imagine that probably 1/10 CP users are socks of
> > one form or another.
Ray Martinez reply:
> Why be a SP at CP if the edit is not true? What is the point?
NonXtianConservative responds:
"It's terribly amusing (and in some way incredibly disheartening) that
when an edit is made that represents such an extreme point of view
that it is latched onto as a beacon of objective thought by Schalfly
and his jack booted toadies. However, when a rational person looks at
the edit from outside they realize how crazy it actually sounds. The
CP crew is working hard to try and keep a fairly big tent, but when
the patina of objectivity is worn off the article to expose the
twisted logic and prejudice underneath it loses all credibility. This
is my goal."
Ray Martinez: Here we have the evidence that the above person admits to being several socks. If the link does not work suddenly it is because our double agent has erased it. But I have it saved on another site where it cannot be erased.
Ray 7-5-07