Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, Moderators, protect
28,031
edits
Changes
no edit summary
[[File:Bloody NYT.jpg|thumb|Bloody NYT]]
[[File:Bloody NYT.jpg|thumb|Bloody NYT]]
===The New York Times' Kristof and the Collapse of Journalistic Standards on Israel (including propagating genocidal Hamas tail tale 5/11/26)===
===The NYT's Kristof & the Collapse of Journalistic Standards on Israel (incl. propagating genocidal Hamas tail tale 5/11/26) ===
Critics accused ''The New York Times'' of engaging in "narrative activism" after columnist Nicholas Kristof published an opinion article alleging systematic sexual abuse of Palestinian detainees by Israeli personnel.<ref>{{cite web |title=How the New York Times Laundered Dubious Sexual Abuse Claims Against Israel |url=[https://honestreporting.com/how-the-new-york-times-laundered-dubious-sexual-abuse-claims-against-israel/](https://honestreporting.com/how-the-new-york-times-laundered-dubious-sexual-abuse-claims-against-israel/) |website=HonestReporting |date=2026-05-12}}</ref> The controversy intensified due to the article’s sourcing, reliance on activist organizations, and publication timing immediately before the release of a major report documenting Hamas sexual violence during the October 7 attacks.<ref>{{cite news |title=Israel slams NYT op-ed on Palestinian abuse, ignoring Oct. 7 sexual violence |url=[https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-895908](https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-895908) |work=The Jerusalem Post |date=2026-05-12}}</ref>
Critics accused ''The New York Times'' of engaging in "narrative activism" after columnist [[Nicholas Kristof]] published an opinion article alleging systematic sexual abuse of Palestinian detainees by Israeli personnel.<ref>{{cite web |title=How the New York Times Laundered Dubious Sexual Abuse Claims Against Israel |url=[https://honestreporting.com/how-the-new-york-times-laundered-dubious-sexual-abuse-claims-against-israel/](https://honestreporting.com/how-the-new-york-times-laundered-dubious-sexual-abuse-claims-against-israel/) |website=HonestReporting |date=2026-05-12}}</ref> The controversy intensified due to the article’s sourcing, reliance on activist organizations, and publication timing immediately before the release of a major report documenting Hamas sexual violence during the October 7 attacks.<ref>{{cite news |title=Israel slams NYT op-ed on Palestinian abuse, ignoring Oct. 7 sexual violence |url=[https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-895908](https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-895908) |work=The Jerusalem Post |date=2026-05-12}}</ref>
'''Criticism of sourcing'''
'''Criticism of sourcing'''
Critics further noted that Euro-Med had previously promoted lies about Israel allegedly “vaporizing” Palestinians into dust.<ref>{{cite web |title=This is how @NickKristof opens his screed |url=[https://twitter.com/EFischberger/status/2053828304377966889](https://twitter.com/EFischberger/status/2053828304377966889) |website=X (Twitter) |author=Eitan Fischberger |date=2026-05-11}}</ref>
Critics further noted that Euro-Med had previously promoted lies about Israel allegedly “vaporizing” Palestinians into dust.<ref>{{cite web |title=This is how @NickKristof opens his screed |url=[https://twitter.com/EFischberger/status/2053828304377966889](https://twitter.com/EFischberger/status/2053828304377966889) |website=X (Twitter) |author=Eitan Fischberger |date=2026-05-11}}</ref>
'''When it comes to Oct. 7, the New York Times prefers baseless claims over actual report'''
A JPost editorial<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-895947 |title=When it comes to Oct. 7, the New York Times prefers baseless claims over actual reports - editorial |publisher=The Jerusalem Post (Editorial) |date=May 13, 2026}}</ref>: 'When it comes to Oct. 7, the New York Times prefers baseless claims over actual reports. And even Kristof himself admits that “it’s impossible to know how common sexual assaults against Palestinians are” -- though that does not stop him from going on about it for almost 4,000 words.'
It points out that Nicholas Kristof and The New York Times blurred the line between opinion writing and investigative journalism by publishing unverified allegations about Israeli abuses of Palestinian prisoners. The outrage is especially promoting a claim — attributed to anonymous testimony and a report from Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor — that (tail tale) ridiculous claim, the accusation implausible and irresponsible to publish.
The piece criticizes Kristof for presenting allegations of systematic rape and sexual torture as effectively established despite admitting there is limited evidence about how widespread such abuses are.
It also points out that Kristof and the Times gave disproportionate attention to allegations against Israel while neglecting or downplaying documented sexual violence committed by Hamas during the October 7 attacks. It points to a report by the Civil Commission on October 7th Crimes by Hamas against Women and Children that the author says received insufficient coverage from the Times.
'''Comparisons to Kristof’s prior reporting controversies'''
'''Comparisons to Kristof’s prior reporting controversies'''