| | The strikingly beautiful and sophisticated use of the Greek language in this book suggests it was written by a great Greek thinker, perhaps someone at the high level of [[Aristotle]] or [[Plato]]. | | The strikingly beautiful and sophisticated use of the Greek language in this book suggests it was written by a great Greek thinker, perhaps someone at the high level of [[Aristotle]] or [[Plato]]. |
| − | Attridge<ref>Attridge, Harold W. ''Epistle to the Hebrews'' Anchor Bible Dictionary</ref> writes: "Although Hebrews is included in the Pauline corpus and was part of that corpus in its earliest attested form ([eg papyrus] ''P46''), it is certainly not a work of the apostle. This fact was recognized, largely on stylistic grounds, even in antiquity. Some patristic authors defended the traditional Pauline attribution with theories of scribal assistants such as Clement of Rome or Luke, but such hypotheses do not do justice to the very un-Pauline treatment of key themes, particularly those of law and faith. Numerous alternative candidates for authorship have been proposed. The most prominent has been [[Barnabas]], to whom [[Tertullian]] assigned the work; [[Apollos]], defended by [[Martin Luther|Luther]] and many moderns; Priscilla, suggested by von Harnack; Epaphras; and Silas. Arguments for none are decisive, and [[Origen|Origen's]] judgment that "''God only knows''" who composed the work is sound." | + | Attridge<ref>Attridge, Harold W. ''Epistle to the Hebrews'' Anchor Bible Dictionary</ref> writes: "Although Hebrews is included in the Pauline corpus and was part of that corpus in its earliest attested form ([eg papyrus] ''P46''), it is certainly not a work of the apostle. This fact was recognized, largely on stylistic grounds, even in antiquity. Some patristic authors defended the traditional Pauline attribution with theories of scribal assistants such as Clement of Rome or Luke, but such hypotheses do not do justice to the very un-Pauline treatment of key themes, particularly those of law and faith. Numerous alternative candidates for authorship have been proposed. The most prominent has been [[Barnabas]], to whom [[Tertullian]] assigned the work; [[Apollos]], defended by [[Martin Luther|Luther]] and many moderns; Priscilla, suggested by von Harnack; Epaphras; and Silas. Arguments for none are decisive, and [[Origen|Origen's]] judgment that "''God only knows''" who composed the work is sound. |
| | Wikipedia acknowledges that this short book is a masterpiece and its authorship is a mystery. Wikipedia speculates about possible authors, and yet omits any mention of [[Jesus]] as a possibility.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Epistle_to_the_Hebrews</ref> The author of this Epistle was certainly a man based on its Greek syntax,<ref>https://www.biblicalfoundations.org/an-introduction-to-hebrews-who-is-the-author/</ref> and yet Wikipedia's lead suggestion for who wrote it is the woman Priscilla. | | Wikipedia acknowledges that this short book is a masterpiece and its authorship is a mystery. Wikipedia speculates about possible authors, and yet omits any mention of [[Jesus]] as a possibility.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Epistle_to_the_Hebrews</ref> The author of this Epistle was certainly a man based on its Greek syntax,<ref>https://www.biblicalfoundations.org/an-introduction-to-hebrews-who-is-the-author/</ref> and yet Wikipedia's lead suggestion for who wrote it is the woman Priscilla. |