1
edit
Changes
→Inconsistence in the article: new section
`--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 18:25, September 26, 2021 (EDT)
`--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 18:25, September 26, 2021 (EDT)
== Inconsistence in the article ==
Hello, i want to talk about since i've noticed some inconsistence, it seems that you all are confusing *Relativism* as a philosophy with the theory of relativity as a scientific idea. To clarify, philosophical relativism and Einstein’s relativity are completely disconnected because they have opposite goals: philosophical relativism claims that there is no absolute truth and everything is subjective, whereas Einstein’s physics relies on rigid, objective absolutes. While Einstein showed that individual measurements of time and space change depending on your speed, he did this to prove that the laws of physics and the speed of light are completely absolute and identical for everyone. In fact, Einstein hated the name "relativity" and wanted to call it Invariance Theory precisely because his work was about finding the unchanging, universal truths of the cosmos and not proving that reality is up for debate, which i think is enough proof to my claim.
If you all have an argument or thing that the misconception with your article is mine's, then be pleased to do so, thanks.