Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,757
edits
Changes
mLine 21:
Line 21: − + − + − + + + +
clean up, typos fixed: ’s → 's
1. Whether respondents have Article III standing.
1. Whether respondents have Article III standing.
2. Whether the government’s challenged conduct transformed private social-media companies’ contentmoderation decisions into state action and violated respondents’ First Amendment rights.
2. Whether the government's challenged conduct transformed private social-media companies’ contentmoderation decisions into state action and violated respondents’ First Amendment rights.
3. Whether the terms and breadth of the preliminary injunction are proper.
3. Whether the terms and breadth of the preliminary injunction are proper.
[[category:First Amendment]]
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
==References==
{{Reflist}}
[[Category:First Amendment]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]