17
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
socialist thought police
::I assume that if liberals reply with jokes, etc., it means they ''acknowledge'' that they cannot dispute the facts or principles involved. Why else would they try to make a distraction? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:00, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
::I assume that if liberals reply with jokes, etc., it means they ''acknowledge'' that they cannot dispute the facts or principles involved. Why else would they try to make a distraction? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:00, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
:::Uh, Ed, while I do consider myself liberal in many areas, I can still see that the person who originally said the quote is quite obviously a severely closed-minded nut.--[[User:Autofire|Autofire]] 22:54, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
:::Uh, Ed, while I do consider myself liberal in many areas, I can still see that the person who originally said the quote is quite obviously a severely closed-minded nut.--[[User:Autofire|Autofire]] 22:54, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
Can I assume real conservatives are not welcome here and their contributions will be [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Settled_science&diff=221475&oldid=221463 deleted] by [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]]'s socialist [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_Police thought police]. [[User:BritishConservative|BritishConservative]] 13:56, 8 July 2007 (EDT)