nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Conservapedia talk:Team contest (view source)
Revision as of 02:01, July 10, 2007
, 02:01, July 10, 2007Variable scoring?
: It think a common page makes more sense for each team, so that players can easily see the contributions of teammates. That's what I'm going to set up for team2 at [[Team2:Record]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:01, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
: It think a common page makes more sense for each team, so that players can easily see the contributions of teammates. That's what I'm going to set up for team2 at [[Team2:Record]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:01, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
::[[Team2:Record]] cannot be seen by the judges, correct? And several users have already set up user:.../contest pages to record their submissions. Wouldn't it be best to stick with user:.../contest, but to transclude (i.e. like a template) those individual pages into [[Team2:Record]]? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
::[[Team2:Record]] cannot be seen by the judges, correct? And several users have already set up user:.../contest pages to record their submissions. Wouldn't it be best to stick with user:.../contest, but to transclude (i.e. like a template) those individual pages into [[Team2:Record]]? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
== Variable scoring? ==
I realise that I'm a bit late to bring this suggestion, but instead of having the following:
* Quality new entry: 10 points
* Any new entry: 6 points
We should have:
* New entry: 6 to 10 points.
(And similar for editing existing entries)
The point being that some "new entries" might be very minimal, while others might be much better, but still not enough to qualify for "Quality new entry". I believe that the judges should have the discretion to allot points anywhere between 6 and 10 depending on the quality.
If we don't do this, it raises another problem. If a competitor creates a new entry that is more than just a very minimal one, do they list it as a "new entry" or a "quality new entry". If they list it as the latter, and the judges deem it to not be so, what happens then? I guess they can reallocate it to "new entry", but if they are going to be deciding which it is, then there's little point in us competitors trying to decide which it is (quality or otherwise).
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:01, 9 July 2007 (EDT)