254
edits
Changes
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 02:38, March 10, 2007
, 02:38, March 10, 2007Wha..?
::::::::JoshuaZ, I know you are a Wikipedia Admin and I was hoping you could answer the question, "Who decides when to discipline the Wikipedia Admins for inappropriate conduct? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:31, 9 March 2007 (EST)conservative
::::::::JoshuaZ, I know you are a Wikipedia Admin and I was hoping you could answer the question, "Who decides when to discipline the Wikipedia Admins for inappropriate conduct? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:31, 9 March 2007 (EST)conservative
:::::::::Admins can be disciplined by Jimbo or the Arbitration Committee, generally someone has to complain first. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 21:35, 9 March 2007 (EST)
:::::::::Admins can be disciplined by Jimbo or the Arbitration Committee, generally someone has to complain first. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 21:35, 9 March 2007 (EST)
== Abortion and breast cancer ==
The article claims that:
"Wikipedia's entry on abortion reads like a brochure for the abortion industry. Wikipedia denies and omits the results of 16 out of 17 statistically significant studies showing increased risk of breast cancer from abortion.[6] Wikipedia's entry also omits the evidence of abortion causing increased premature birth of subsequent children.[7]."
, while this is plainly not true. Wikipedia has an entire article (50 kilobytes long!!) about it, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion-breast_cancer_hypothesis|here]. Please, someone who has sufficient priveleges, change the article to admit this information.