Changes

Talk:Roe v. Wade (view source)

Revision as of 03:49, March 10, 2007

296 bytes added , 03:49, March 10, 2007

no edit summary

Line 1: Line 1: −

I've deleted the comment about Roe being a lesbian. It seems the kind of thing a reference is needed for. One for her real name would be nice too. [User:Lil_cain|lil_cain]] 03.43, 10 March 2007 (GMT)

+

I've deleted the comment about Roe being a lesbian. It seems the kind of thing a reference is needed for. One for her real name would be nice too. [[User:Lil_cain|lil_cain]] 03.43, 10 March 2007 (GMT)

LOL! Great edit, Lil Cain. If she really was a lesbian, it's funny that she got pregnant. I would think a cite would be needed for that...--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 22:45, 9 March 2007 (EST)

−

I've also edited out the section about no one caring about the judgement for a time. Even if it was not widely known(something I don't have the first notion about), I'm sure a substaintal minority of those affected did care at the time(I am of course open to being rebutted on this, but with references preferably)[User:Lil_cain|lil_cain]] 03.46, 10 March 2007 (GMT)

+

I've also edited out the section about no one caring about the judgement for a time. Even if it was not widely known(something I don't have the first notion about), I'm sure a substaintal minority of those affected did care at the time(I am of course open to being rebutted on this, but with references preferably)

+

also, should the bit at the end not be a statement of fact, or not there? Surely what the judgement says is legal fact at this point, not opinion

+

[[User:Lil_cain|lil_cain]] 03.46, 10 March 2007 (GMT)

+

also, should the bit at the end not be a statement of fact, or not there? Surely what the judgement says is legal fact at this point, not opinion

Lil cain

40

edits