Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: − + − + − *[[Biology]] + +
Whether human nature ought to be the exclusive province of biology is a matter of debate. Theologians continually raise objections to such a viewpoint.
Scientists, educators, philosphers, and sociologists who embrace the perspective of [[philosophical naturalism]] deliberately overlook man's spiritual nature.
Scientists, educators, philosphers, and sociologists who embrace the perspective of [[philosophical naturalism]] deliberately overlook man's spiritual nature.
[[Methodogical naturalism]] deliberately overlooks the possibility that human nature, behavior or thinking is influenced by any influences by anything other than [[natural]] causes (see also [[determinism]]).
[[Methodogical naturalism]] deliberately overlooks the possibility that human behavior, emotion or thinking is influenced by any influences by anything other than [[natural]] causes (see also [[determinism]]).
Academic scholarship related to human beings falls under any of the following fields of study:
Academic of human beings falls under any of the following fields of study, which collectively are known as the "social sciences"::
*[[Anthropology]]
*[[Anthropology]]
*[[Psychology]]
*[[Psychology]]
*[[Sociology]]
*[[Sociology]]
*[[Economics]]
*[[Economics]]
*[[Political science]]
*[[Political science]]
Whether human nature ought to be the exclusive province of [[biology]] is a matter of debate. Theologians continually raise objections to such a viewpoint.