Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 64: Line 64:  
(It should be noted that post modernists might very well have an epistemological objection to knowing any descriptive truth- NOT because those truths don't exist, but because we are incapable of knowing them, for a variety of reasons. However this is an epistemological objection,  and not relevant to the ontological question of whether or not objective [normative] truth exists as such.) ~Essariel 5-28-07
 
(It should be noted that post modernists might very well have an epistemological objection to knowing any descriptive truth- NOT because those truths don't exist, but because we are incapable of knowing them, for a variety of reasons. However this is an epistemological objection,  and not relevant to the ontological question of whether or not objective [normative] truth exists as such.) ~Essariel 5-28-07
   −
If objective truth did not exist than immediately following the most recent campus murdering spree in VA Tech, there would have been myriad pundits asking the question "Was this a bad thing to have occurred?"  The fact that no one even considered that a question implicitly proves that there is in afact an objective truth and consequently an objective moral order.  If you can't see that, you're really not trying to look.
+
If objective truth did not exist than immediately following the most recent campus murdering spree in VA Tech, there would have been myriad pundits asking the question "Was this a bad thing to have occurred?"  The fact that no one even considered that a question implicitly proves that there is in fact an objective truth and consequently an objective moral order.  If you can't see that, you're really not trying to look.
    
Be careful with claims like that - I can think of at least one person who felt that massacre wasn't a bad thing, and although the vast majority of humanity may disagree with him, Cho clearly felt his actions were "good" enough under his own system of beliefs to carry them out.  Objective truth is not a popularity contest.--[[User:Guybrush|Guybrush]] 1:25, 8 July 2007 (EDT)
 
Be careful with claims like that - I can think of at least one person who felt that massacre wasn't a bad thing, and although the vast majority of humanity may disagree with him, Cho clearly felt his actions were "good" enough under his own system of beliefs to carry them out.  Objective truth is not a popularity contest.--[[User:Guybrush|Guybrush]] 1:25, 8 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
 +
"'We know that we know nothing,' they chatter, blanking out the fact that they are claiming knowledge -- 'There are no absolutes,' they chatter, blanking out the fact that they are uttering an absolute -- 'You cannot prove that you exist or that you're conscious,' they chatter, blanking out the fact that proof presupposes existence, consciousness and a complex chain of knowledge: the existence of something to know, or a consciousness able to know it, and of a knowledge that has learned to distinguish between such concepts as the proved and the unproved."
 +
:Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
 +
[[User:Cthx]]
32

edits

Navigation menu