Changes

Ehrlich was not even original in his falsehood.  His theory was a more calamitous version of the theory proposed by [[Thomas Malthus]] centuries earlier.

Ehrlich was not even original in his falsehood.  His theory was a more calamitous version of the theory proposed by [[Thomas Malthus]] centuries earlier.

The false theories of population growth underlying the book continue to be held by proponents of population control today, though they no longer cite the book as an authority.

The theories of population growth underlying the book continue to be held by proponents of population control today, though they no longer cite the book as an authority.

A bestseller with the public, the book ranks #11 on a conservative list of the worst books of the 19th and 20th century.<ref>[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th Centuries] retrieved March 10, 2007</ref>

A bestseller with the public, the book ranks #11 on a conservative list of the worst books of the 19th and 20th century.<ref>[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th Centuries] retrieved March 10, 2007</ref>