Changes

comment to judges
Line 78: Line 78:  
**2 points of extra credit for using it in an article
 
**2 points of extra credit for using it in an article
 
**2 points of extra credit if the image is of exceptional quality
 
**2 points of extra credit if the image is of exceptional quality
 +
 +
== Comment to Judges ==
 +
 +
In my humble opinion, as judges you have the power to use some discretion with this point system.  My view is that this point system is advisory, and I personally do not insist on receiving a full 6 points for every single entry, no matter how simple.  Also, I recall at least one block by [[User:DeborahB.]] that was worth far more than two points.
 +
 +
You are judges and while we don't want any [[judicial activism]], I personally appreciate wisdom from the bench!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:04, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits