nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
no edit summary
{{Welcome}} I like your edit to John the Baptist. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] <sup>[[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]]</sup> 15:12, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
:The article didn't seem complete without it. I wanted to see how it would go over before adding similar edits to other biblical persons who have played roles as resurrected beings in the restauration. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 15:32, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
::Look at my user page and you'll get a clue. I suspect the evangelicals on this site are going to fight this change. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] <sup>[[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]]</sup> 15:57, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
::Thanks for your constructive edits and comments. I think a "Mormon Beliefs" section (properly cited of course) is the only way we can even survive on this "Conservative" site. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] <sup>[[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]]</sup> 19:46, 28 June 2007 (EDT)
== Your help ==
Thank you for your help in some of the articles I have started.
About [[Ted Williams]] the word that he used was: your..., not you're.
About [[Saint Alban]]:
'''See also ''' is not a collection of links about the same subject but an invitacion to see articles that, that particular readear could be interested.
About Babe Ruth:
In Mexico and in Latinamerica is best known as Baby Ruth.
*[http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/deportes/82422.html]
also in english:
*[http://xroads.virginia.edu/~UG02/yeung/Baberuth/home.html]
This "Baby" could be questionable.
For that reason I invite you to undo those 2 first changes, if you please.
--[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 22:25, 14 July 2007 (EDT)
:Actually, the only way that Ted Williams said 'your' is if he had absolutely no concept of grammar. If he said the sound shared by the English words 'your', "you're", and 'yore', he most certainly meant the contraction of 'you are.' Now if he wrote the quote and actually used the word 'your' then that would be a different matter and the word 'your' would have to stand. However, since no source (interview, letter, etc...) is given for the original quote I am assuming that he used proper English grammar, in which case the word would be "you're."
:I don't share your view about "See also." I feel that "See also" links should have some sort of direct relationship with the article where they are found. However, this is probably something that should be discussed on [[Talk:Saint Alban]].
:Baby Ruth is not used in English to refer to the baseball player. The quote in the link you provided was a quip by a comedian ([[George Bernard Shaw]]). I understand that Spanish-speakers may refer to Babe Ruth as Baby Ruth, but since the article is written in English I feel like the caption should be correct. Perhaps it can be noted elsewhere on the page that he is referred to as Baby Ruth in Mexico and Latin America. Again, this is probably better suited for [[Talk:Babe Ruth]]. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 01:03, 15 July 2007 (EDT)
== Wikipedia ==
The current policy is to remove the parts from Wikipedia unless the person copying wrote the Wikipedia article. Which article? [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 22:17, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
:The entire [[Texas holdem]] article is a copy of the first paragraph of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Texas_hold_%27em&oldid=123817076 corresponding Wikipedia article] as it existed on the day the Conservapedia article was created. I noticed this because the user who did the copy/paste job left in the first two references at the end of the second sentence, but didn't actually make them references, so they just showed up as [1][2]. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 22:35, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
:In the future blank the page with a Copied from WP edit summary. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 01:21, 17 July 2007 (EDT)