nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 399:
Line 399: + + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 14:25, July 25, 2007
, 14:25, July 25, 2007→Take a step back: You are expressing your bias, whilst denouncing mine.
*The poor quality of a lot of the articles, like [[Sparta]]
*The poor quality of a lot of the articles, like [[Sparta]]
*The unbelievably humourous, yet worrying level of bias on this site, which infinitely outdo's any accidental bias wiki may or may not engage in. [[User:Denzo|Denzo]] 09:33, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
*The unbelievably humourous, yet worrying level of bias on this site, which infinitely outdo's any accidental bias wiki may or may not engage in. [[User:Denzo|Denzo]] 09:33, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
:You don't agree that we should have a bias towards accuracy and fairness? Where do you think our bias should be then? To inaccuracy and unfairness?
:Okay, let's take homosexuality. Logic is logic; there's not such thing as "scientific logic" and "petty logic". And I don't discriminate "when I feel like it". And I don't denounce homosexuality on religious grounds. I denounce it on the grounds that the Creator of us designed us to be heterosexual. I consider that to be a fact. Do you have hard, factual, evidence that I'm wrong? I'd like to see it, rather than you simply dismiss it by labelling it as "religious".
:I would also rather my children read the facts about homosexuality, but what makes you think that what the Bible says is not factual? The fact that you don't ''care'' what the Bible says is you showing your bias, not an argument from logic or science.
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:25, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
== What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias? ==
== What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias? ==